Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1635598

Watertight Tensor-Product Spline Reconstruction (KCNSC PDRD Technical Report)

Abstract

The standard for representing geometric models in Computer Aided Design (CAD) systems is boundary representation with trimmed surfaces. However, the approximate nature of surface-surface intersections in CAD systems leaves many small gaps between mating surfaces. These gaps lead to problems for downstream analysis and manufacturing applications, requiring time consuming repair operations and further approximation of the geometry as polygonal meshes, which do not support design iteration. In this study, nVariate, Inc. evaluated its watertight reconstruction technology on a test part. The resulting watertight model has the same absolute model accuracy of the original model zero gaps, providing a representation that requires no repair and supports further design iterations in the CAD system.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Urick, Benjamin, Crawford, Richard H., Jennings, Ryan, Vernon, Gregory. 2020-07-01. Watertight Tensor-Product Spline Reconstruction (KCNSC PDRD Technical Report). https://doi.org/10.2172/1635598

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗