Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1653338

Materials Data on Li2Ti3(GaO4)3 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2Ti3(GaO4)3 is beta indium sulfide-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded to six O atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent GaO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. There are two shorter (2.13 Å) and four longer (2.17 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to six O atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra. There are two shorter (1.99 Å) and four longer (2.20 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the third Li site, Li is bonded to six O atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra. There are two shorter (2.02 Å) and four longer (2.21 Å) Li–O bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Ti sites. In the first Ti site, Ti is bonded to six O atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent GaO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–2.07 Å. In the second Ti site, Ti is bonded to six O atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one GaO6 octahedra, edges with two TiO6 octahedra, and edges with three LiO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.09 Å. There are two inequivalent Ga sites. In the first Ga site, Ga is bonded to four O atoms to form GaO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent GaO6 octahedra, corners with five LiO6 octahedra, and corners with five TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 45–60°. There are a spread of Ga–O bond distances ranging from 1.86–1.89 Å. In the second Ga site, Ga is bonded to six O atoms to form GaO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. All Ga–O bond lengths are 2.01 Å. There are seven inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to two Li, one Ti, and one Ga atom. In the second O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Ga atoms. In the third O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal non-coplanar geometry to one Li and two equivalent Ti atoms. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal non-coplanar geometry to one Li and two equivalent Ti atoms. In the fifth O site, O is bonded in a trigonal non-coplanar geometry to two Ti and one Ga atom. In the sixth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Ga atoms. In the seventh O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Ti, and one Ga atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-01. Materials Data on Li2Ti3(GaO4)3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1653338

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗