DOE OSTI · 1663195
Reply to: “Pitfalls in identifying active catalyst species”
Abstract
In Pereira-Hernández et al., we reported the influence of the high-temperature vapor-phase synthesis method (also called atom trapping, or AT) on the activity for CO oxidation of a Pt/CeO 2 catalyst, compared to a conventional synthesis method (strong electrostatic adsorption, or SEA). The findings suggest that the AT method leads to increased activity compared to the SEA method, and this is related to improved redox properties of the support at low temperature. Recently, Ren and Chen questioned the interpretation of the results and suggested alternative explanations for the findings. However, as addressed in this paper, we are firmly of the opinion that the original analysis, results, and conclusions provided in Pereira-Hernández et al. are valid and accurately explain the phenomena observed.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Pereira-Hernández, Xavier Isidro, DeLaRiva, Andrew, Muravev, Valery, Kunwar, Deepak, Xiong, Haifeng, Sudduth, Berlin J., Engelhard, Mark, Kovarik, Libor, Hensen, Emiel J. M., Wang, Yong, Datye, Abhaya K.. 2020-09-11. Reply to: “Pitfalls in identifying active catalyst species”. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18193-2
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.