Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1663780

Materials Data on LaGa3Fe10C by Materials Project

Abstract

LaFe10Ga3C crystallizes in the orthorhombic Fmm2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. La is bonded in a distorted linear geometry to ten Fe, six Ga, and two equivalent C atoms. There are a spread of La–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.46–3.51 Å. There are a spread of La–Ga bond distances ranging from 3.38–3.43 Å. There are one shorter (2.88 Å) and one longer (2.89 Å) La–C bond lengths. There are nine inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded in a single-bond geometry to four Fe, three Ga, and one C atom. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.48–2.60 Å. There are two shorter (2.57 Å) and one longer (2.66 Å) Fe–Ga bond lengths. The Fe–C bond length is 1.85 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded in a single-bond geometry to four Fe, three Ga, and one C atom. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.47–2.63 Å. There are a spread of Fe–Ga bond distances ranging from 2.55–2.67 Å. The Fe–C bond length is 1.86 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to ten Fe and two equivalent Ga atoms to form FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra that share corners with four FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra, corners with four equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with ten FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 29°. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.39–2.49 Å. Both Fe–Ga bond lengths are 2.58 Å. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded to eight Fe and four Ga atoms to form FeGa4Fe8 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeLa2Ga4Fe6 cuboctahedra, corners with four equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with ten FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 30°. There are two shorter (2.42 Å) and two longer (2.43 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. There are two shorter (2.58 Å) and two longer (2.59 Å) Fe–Ga bond lengths. In the fifth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent La, seven Fe, and three Ga atoms to form distorted FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra that share corners with ten FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, edges with four equivalent FeLa2Ga4Fe6 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with ten FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 76°. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.55 Å. There are one shorter (2.55 Å) and two longer (2.61 Å) Fe–Ga bond lengths. In the sixth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent La, six Fe, and four Ga atoms to form distorted FeLa2Ga4Fe6 cuboctahedra that share corners with ten FeGa4Fe8 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, edges with six FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with nine FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 75°. There are two shorter (2.57 Å) and one longer (2.60 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. There are a spread of Fe–Ga bond distances ranging from 2.51–2.59 Å. In the seventh Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent La, seven Fe, and three Ga atoms to form distorted FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra that share corners with twelve FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, edges with four equivalent FeLa2Ga2Fe8 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with eight FeGa4Fe8 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 76°. There are one shorter (2.55 Å) and one longer (2.65 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. There are one shorter (2.52 Å) and two longer (2.60 Å) Fe–Ga bond lengths. In the eighth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent La, eight Fe, and two Ga atoms to form distorted FeLa2Ga2Fe8 cuboctahedra that share corners with ten FeGa4Fe8 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, edges with four equivalent FeLa2Ga3Fe7 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with nine FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 76°. There are two shorter (2.59 Å) and one longer (2.65 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. There are one shorter (2.51 Å) and one longer (2.54 Å) Fe–Ga bond lengths. In the ninth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent La, nine Fe, and one Ga atom to form distorted FeLa2GaFe9 cuboctahedra that share corners with thirteen FeGa4Fe8 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeLa2Ga4Fe6 cuboctahedra, faces with eleven FeGa4Fe8 cuboctahedra, and faces with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 63°. The Fe–Ga bond length is 2.72 Å. There are three inequivalent Ga sites. In the first Ga site, Ga is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent La, nine Fe, and one Ga atom. The Ga–Ga bond length is 2.83 Å. In the second Ga site, Ga is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent La and ten Fe atoms. In the third Ga site, Ga is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent La, nine Fe, and one Ga atom. C is bonded to two equivalent La and four Fe atoms to form distorted CLa2Fe4 octahedra that share corners with fourteen FeGa2Fe10 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CLa2Fe4 octahedra, edges with eight FeLa2Ga2Fe8 cuboctahedra, and faces with two equivalent FeLa2GaFe9 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 0°.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on LaGa3Fe10C by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1663780

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗