Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1669616

NREL's Capabilities in Algae-Based Chemicals, Polymers, and Fuels

Laurens, Lieve (ORCID:0000000349303267)
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

NREL is advancing research and development (R&D) to maximize photosynthetic carbon capture into biomass for conversion to a broad portfolio of valuable products. Areas of focus include: (1) Carbon capture improvement through photosynthesis engineering; (2) Biotechnology and genetic toolbox development for broad species portfolio; (3) Conversion and fractionation of algal biomass to create high-value products and fuels; (4) Biological seaweed conversion to volatile fatty acids as fuel and product feedstocks; (5) Novel polyurethane production synthesis from fully renewable algae-based feedstocks; (6) Advanced analytical characterization of biomass feedstocks; and (7) Process techno-economic and life cycle modeling.

Explore related subjects

algaebiomassBIOMASS FUELS,INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY,SYNTHETIC FUELScarbon capture

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Laurens, Lieve (ORCID:0000000349303267). 2020-09-25. NREL's Capabilities in Algae-Based Chemicals, Polymers, and Fuels. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1669616

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2025

Developing Microalgae-Based Non-Isocyanate Polyurethane Foam Materials

Polyurethane is a versatile material with a wide range of applications in the production of foam products such as car seats, mattresses, footwear, insulation foam, and more. The traditional process for producing polyurethane foam involves the fast reaction of isocyanate with water, which generates CO2 as a blowing agent. However, the use of isocyanate has raised concerns due to its potential for causing allergic reactions and aspiration symptoms. This has led to increased regulation of isocyanate, leading to a growing interest in developing alternatives. Non-isocyanate polyurethane (NIPU) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional toxic PU production. The most promising approach for producing NIPU is the aminolysis of cyclic carbonate with diamine. The NIPU produced through this process has a polyhydroxyurethane structure, which is similar to traditional PU chemistry. We have demonstrated that microalgal oil is a favored feedstock, as it can provide high reactivity for industrial applications. However, the NIPU production process does not generate gas, and a blowing agent is required to achieve the desired foam structure. One of the challenges in producing NIPU foam is to match the bubble formation and curing rates. We have developed a novel approach to producing NIPU foam that utilizes carbamate as a bifunctional blowing and crosslinking agent. We have used vegetable oil and microalgal oil as feedstocks to produce various NIPU for characterization. The development of microalgal NIPU provides an exciting opportunity for reducing the environmental impact of foam production and improving the safety of the materials used in the production process. The production of value-added NIPU foam can also drive down the cost of microalgal biorefinery, advancing the commercialization of microalgal biofuel.

algae↗
DOE OSTI2024

Chapter 7.1: Microalgae

Microalgae is a unique biomass resource that does not need to compete for land and water with other biomass feedstocks because it can be cultivated on low-quality unencumbered land using noncompetitive water types including saline and wastewater. It is included as a complementary resource alongside other biomass feedstocks reported in this study, albeit at higher biomass production costs reflective of more capital-intensive farming operations than typical for terrestrial biomass. Higher biomass costs can be offset by the potential to produce value-added coproducts unique to compositional constituents of microalgae. Relative to BT16, this chapter reflects the latest analysis from the 2022 Algae Harmonization Update, which uses the latest parameterized and high-performing saline algal strain, second-generation carbon capture of point-source waste CO2 and high-pressure pipeline transport resolved to specific point-source types, saline water sourcing up to 40,000 mg/L total dissolved solids for source and makeup water salinity, blowdown water treatment and recycle, and brine disposal handling. National-scale algal biomass availability potential was calculated at 152 million tons/yr ash-free dry weight (AFDW) (191 million tons/yr dry weight) at an average biomass productivity of 26.2 g/m2 -day AFDW (about 50 tons/acre/yr dry weight).1 The algal biomass was cultivated on 3.9 million acres of multi-criteria screened and potentially available land for CONUS and fixed 268 million tons of waste CO2 based on biomass uptake. The algae biomass can be produced at an average MBSP of $674/ton AFDW ($536/ton dry weight) in 2020 dollars,2 corresponding to a total energy potential of 3.3 quads/yr at an average MBSP of $31.2/MMBtu (higher-heating-value [HHV] basis).

algae↗
DOE OSTI2023

Pretreatment of Algae for the Production of Fuels and Chemical Coproducts

Algal biomass is a promising resource for producing renewable fuels and chemicals, but despite decades of research, algal biorefining remains in a pre-commercial state. Recent economic analyses have indicated that high-value co-products are necessary to offset the cost of fuel production, implying the need for algae fractionation technology. One promising fractionation approach is Combined Algal Processing (CAP), which pretreats and extracts algal biomass to produce a fermentable aqueous hydrolysate, an organic lipid fraction, and a residual solids fraction. The CAP approach has historically employed a dilute acid pretreatment to lyse cells and solubilize algal carbohydrates for fermentation of the hydrolysate phase, but we recently identified alternative pretreatments with the potential to decrease costs and environmental impacts, including different implementations of dilute acid pretreatment, dilute alkali pretreatment, enzymatic pretreatment, and flash hydrolysis. We conducted a screening of six different pretreatment approaches across nine algae strains of varying composition, and measured pretreatment effectiveness as a combination of carbon and nitrogen solubilization, lipid extraction yield, and lipid speciation. In this screening, we found traditional dilute acid pretreatment to provide the most robust pretreatment performance, though other pretreatments were competitive, and some performed better for certain strains of algae. These results highlight the interplay between algae composition and pretreatment effectiveness.

algae↗