Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1675724

Materials Data on U3(CoNi2)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

U3(CoNi2)2 is Hexagonal Laves-derived structured and crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent U sites. In the first U site, U is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Co and eight Ni atoms. There are a spread of U–Co bond distances ranging from 2.85–2.89 Å. There are a spread of U–Ni bond distances ranging from 2.90–2.94 Å. In the second U site, U is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to five Co and seven Ni atoms. There are a spread of U–Co bond distances ranging from 2.86–2.90 Å. There are a spread of U–Ni bond distances ranging from 2.91–2.94 Å. In the third U site, U is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to three equivalent Co and nine Ni atoms. There are two shorter (2.86 Å) and one longer (2.87 Å) U–Co bond lengths. There are a spread of U–Ni bond distances ranging from 2.91–2.94 Å. There are three inequivalent Co sites. In the first Co site, Co is bonded to six U, two equivalent Co, and four Ni atoms to form CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra that share corners with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with fourteen NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra. Both Co–Co bond lengths are 2.52 Å. All Co–Ni bond lengths are 2.50 Å. In the second Co site, Co is bonded to six U and six Ni atoms to form CoU6Ni6 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, corners with ten NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with seventeen NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Co–Ni bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.52 Å. In the third Co site, Co is bonded to six U, two equivalent Co, and four Ni atoms to form CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight CoU6Ni6 cuboctahedra, corners with ten NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, faces with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve NiU6Co3Ni3 cuboctahedra. There are two shorter (2.45 Å) and two longer (2.46 Å) Co–Ni bond lengths. There are five inequivalent Ni sites. In the first Ni site, Ni is bonded to six U, two equivalent Co, and four Ni atoms to form NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra that share corners with five CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, corners with thirteen NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, faces with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve NiU6Co3Ni3 cuboctahedra. All Ni–Ni bond lengths are 2.46 Å. In the second Ni site, Ni is bonded to six U, three Co, and three Ni atoms to form NiU6Co3Ni3 cuboctahedra that share corners with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent NiU6Co3Ni3 cuboctahedra, faces with nine CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with nine NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra. There are one shorter (2.43 Å) and one longer (2.44 Å) Ni–Ni bond lengths. In the third Ni site, Ni is bonded to six equivalent U, two equivalent Co, and four Ni atoms to form NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoU6Ni6 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, faces with six equivalent CoU6Ni6 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra. Both Ni–Ni bond lengths are 2.44 Å. In the fourth Ni site, Ni is bonded to six U, four Co, and two equivalent Ni atoms to form NiU6Co4Ni2 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent CoU6Ni6 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with six NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, faces with eight NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with ten CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra. In the fifth Ni site, Ni is bonded to six U, two equivalent Co, and four Ni atoms to form NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra that share corners with six CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, edges with six NiU6Co4Ni2 cuboctahedra, faces with seven CoU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra, and faces with eleven NiU6Co2Ni4 cuboctahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-05. Materials Data on U3(CoNi2)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1675724

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗