Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1678630

Materials Data on Li19Cu4(HO2)8 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li19Cu4(HO2)8 crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are nineteen inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.18 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.32 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.43 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form corner-sharing LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.04 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.09 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.07 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.06 Å. In the eighth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.34 Å. In the ninth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.10 Å. In the tenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.19 Å. In the eleventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.39 Å. In the twelfth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted square co-planar geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.11 Å. In the thirteenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.05 Å. In the fourteenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.09 Å. In the fifteenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.01 Å. In the sixteenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.01 Å. In the seventeenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.13 Å. In the eighteenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to three O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.12 Å. In the nineteenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.24 Å. There are four inequivalent Cu+1.25+ sites. In the first Cu+1.25+ site, Cu+1.25+ is bonded in a linear geometry to two O2- atoms. There is one shorter (1.79 Å) and one longer (1.80 Å) Cu–O bond length. In the second Cu+1.25+ site, Cu+1.25+ is bonded in a linear geometry to two O2- atoms. There is one shorter (1.79 Å) and one longer (1.82 Å) Cu–O bond length. In the third Cu+1.25+ site, Cu+1.25+ is bonded in a linear geometry to two O2- atoms. There is one shorter (1.79 Å) and one longer (1.81 Å) Cu–O bond length. In the fourth Cu+1.25+ site, Cu+1.25+ is bonded in a linear geometry to two O2- atoms. There is one shorter (1.76 Å) and one longer (1.78 Å) Cu–O bond length. There are eight inequivalent H1+ sites. In the first H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.98 Å. In the second H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.98 Å. In the third H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.98 Å. In the fourth H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.98 Å. In the fifth H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.97 Å. In the sixth H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.98 Å. In the seventh H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.97 Å. In the eighth H1+ site, H1+ is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one O2- atom. The H–O bond length is 0.98 Å. There are sixteen inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to five Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to five Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom to form corner-sharing OLi5Cu octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 9–41°. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom to form corner-sharing OLi5Cu octahedra. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to five Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to six Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to five Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to five Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom to form corner-sharing OLi5Cu octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 24–31°. In the thirteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom to form corner-sharing OLi4Cu square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 27–34°. In the fourteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to five Li1+ and one Cu+1.25+ atom to form distorted OLi5Cu octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLi5Cu octahedra and corners with two equivalent OLi4Cu square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 9–41°. In the fifteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to six Li1+ and one H1+ atom. In the sixteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to five Li1+ and one H1+ atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on Li19Cu4(HO2)8 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1678630

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗