Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1688579

Coupon Container Pressure Test

Edwards, William A.
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A total of six containers were tested to verify the Maximum Allowed Working Pressure (MAWP) rating of 100 psi. Three Inner Container Pressure Test Assemblies (1006759387-AA) and three Outer Container Pressure Test Assemblies (1006729168-AA) were tested. The container serial numbering is the drawing number followed by the serial number (i.e.,1006759387-###). The test procedure was performed as follows: 1. Pressurize to 50 psi and hold for 5 minutes. 2. Increase pressure to 100 psi and hold for 5 minutes. 3. Increase pressure to 150 psi and hold for a minimum of 20 minutes. A container is considered to pass if the pressure drops less than 1% at the end of the 20 minutes. All six containers passed the test.

Explore related subjects

42 ENGINEERING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Edwards, William A.. 2020-10-01. Coupon Container Pressure Test. https://doi.org/10.2172/1688579

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗