Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1689640

Materials Data on Li8Pr7Ge10 by Materials Project

Abstract

Pr7Li8Ge10 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Cmmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded to three Pr and four Ge atoms to form distorted LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra that share corners with five equivalent LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent PrGe6 octahedra, edges with six LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra, and faces with four LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra. There are two shorter (3.17 Å) and one longer (3.18 Å) Li–Pr bond lengths. There are a spread of Li–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.67–2.79 Å. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to three Pr and four Ge atoms to form distorted LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one PrGe6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra, and faces with four LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 52°. There are two shorter (3.17 Å) and one longer (3.19 Å) Li–Pr bond lengths. There are a spread of Li–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.58–2.76 Å. There are four inequivalent Pr sites. In the first Pr site, Pr is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Li and six Ge atoms. There are four shorter (3.16 Å) and two longer (3.18 Å) Pr–Ge bond lengths. In the second Pr site, Pr is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to nine Ge atoms. There are a spread of Pr–Ge bond distances ranging from 3.15–3.35 Å. In the third Pr site, Pr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Li and six Ge atoms. All Pr–Ge bond lengths are 3.23 Å. In the fourth Pr site, Pr is bonded to six Ge atoms to form PrGe6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent PrGe6 octahedra, and edges with eight equivalent LiPr3Ge4 tetrahedra. There are four shorter (3.14 Å) and two longer (3.18 Å) Pr–Ge bond lengths. There are four inequivalent Ge sites. In the first Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Li and three Pr atoms. In the second Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Li and three Pr atoms. In the third Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Li, six Pr, and one Ge atom. The Ge–Ge bond length is 2.57 Å. In the fourth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to one Li, six Pr, and two equivalent Ge atoms. There are one shorter (2.52 Å) and one longer (2.54 Å) Ge–Ge bond lengths.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on Li8Pr7Ge10 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1689640

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗