Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1692820

Materials Data on Nb5Si6Mo5 by Materials Project

Abstract

Nb5Mo5Si6 crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Nb+2.60+ sites. In the first Nb+2.60+ site, Nb+2.60+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with six NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with nine MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with two equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with five MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Nb–Si bond distances ranging from 2.57–2.90 Å. In the second Nb+2.60+ site, Nb+2.60+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with two equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with thirteen MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with two equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with five MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Nb–Si bond distances ranging from 2.59–2.89 Å. In the third Nb+2.60+ site, Nb+2.60+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with six NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with nine MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, and faces with seven MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Nb–Si bond distances ranging from 2.58–2.87 Å. In the fourth Nb+2.60+ site, Nb+2.60+ is bonded to four Si4- atoms to form distorted NbSi4 tetrahedra that share corners with six NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with ten MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with three NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with five MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Nb–Si bond distances ranging from 2.66–2.68 Å. There are five inequivalent Mo+2.20+ sites. In the first Mo+2.20+ site, Mo+2.20+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with seven NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with eight MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with three MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with four NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Mo–Si bond distances ranging from 2.57–2.90 Å. In the second Mo+2.20+ site, Mo+2.20+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with seven NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with eight MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with three MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with four NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Mo–Si bond distances ranging from 2.60–2.91 Å. In the third Mo+2.20+ site, Mo+2.20+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with five NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with ten MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with three MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with four NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Mo–Si bond distances ranging from 2.56–2.90 Å. In the fourth Mo+2.20+ site, Mo+2.20+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with seven MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with eight NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with three NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with four MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Mo–Si bond distances ranging from 2.57–2.89 Å. In the fifth Mo+2.20+ site, Mo+2.20+ is bonded to six Si4- atoms to form distorted MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with four equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with eleven MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with four equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with two equivalent NbSi4 tetrahedra, faces with two equivalent NbSi6 pentagonal pyramids, and faces with five MoSi6 pentagonal pyramids. There are a spread of Mo–Si bond distances ranging from 2.53–2.88 Å. There are five inequivalent Si4- sites. In the first Si4- site, Si4- is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to three Nb+2.60+, five Mo+2.20+, and two equivalent Si4- atoms. There are one shorter (2.50 Å) and one longer (2.54 Å) Si–Si bond lengths. In the second Si4- site, Si4- is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to four Nb+2.60+ and six Mo+2.20+ atoms. In the third Si4- site, Si4- is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to five Nb+2.60+ and five Mo+2.20+ atoms. In the fourth Si4- site, Si4- is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to five Nb+2.60+ and five Mo+2.20+ atoms. In the fifth Si4- site, Si4- is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to six Nb+2.60+ and four Mo+2.20+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2019-01-12. Materials Data on Nb5Si6Mo5 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1692820

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗