Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1693152

Materials Data on Rb21Tl7(Br21O4)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Rb21Tl7(O4Br21)2 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Rb1+ sites. In the first Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a body-centered cubic geometry to eight equivalent O2- atoms. All Rb–O bond lengths are 3.07 Å. In the second Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Br+0.29- atoms. There are two shorter (3.41 Å) and four longer (3.57 Å) Rb–Br bond lengths. In the third Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight Br+0.29- atoms. There are a spread of Rb–Br bond distances ranging from 3.38–3.82 Å. In the fourth Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to one O2- and seven Br+0.29- atoms. The Rb–O bond length is 2.84 Å. There are a spread of Rb–Br bond distances ranging from 3.56–3.67 Å. There are three inequivalent Tl1+ sites. In the first Tl1+ site, Tl1+ is bonded in an octahedral geometry to six Br+0.29- atoms. There are two shorter (2.60 Å) and four longer (2.96 Å) Tl–Br bond lengths. In the second Tl1+ site, Tl1+ is bonded in an octahedral geometry to six Br+0.29- atoms. There are two shorter (2.71 Å) and four longer (2.84 Å) Tl–Br bond lengths. In the third Tl1+ site, Tl1+ is bonded in an octahedral geometry to six Br+0.29- atoms. There are a spread of Tl–Br bond distances ranging from 2.71–3.07 Å. O2- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two Rb1+ and two equivalent Br+0.29- atoms. Both O–Br bond lengths are 3.02 Å. There are seven inequivalent Br+0.29- sites. In the first Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded to five Rb1+ and one Tl1+ atom to form distorted BrRb5Tl octahedra that share corners with two equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra, corners with four equivalent BrRb4Tl square pyramids, a cornercorner with one BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramid, edges with two equivalent BrRb4Tl square pyramids, faces with two equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra, faces with two equivalent BrRb4Tl square pyramids, and a faceface with one BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–39°. In the second Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded to four Rb1+ and one Tl1+ atom to form distorted BrRb4Tl square pyramids that share corners with four equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra, a cornercorner with one BrRb4Tl square pyramid, corners with two equivalent BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra, and edges with four BrRb4Tl square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 46–48°. In the third Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Rb1+, one Tl1+, and two equivalent O2- atoms. In the fourth Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Rb1+ and one Tl1+ atom. In the fifth Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded in a single-bond geometry to one Tl1+ atom. In the sixth Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded to four Rb1+ and one Tl1+ atom to form distorted BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramids that share corners with two equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra, corners with six BrRb4Tl square pyramids, a cornercorner with one BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramid, edges with two equivalent BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramids, and faces with two equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 34°. In the seventh Br+0.29- site, Br+0.29- is bonded to four Rb1+ and one Tl1+ atom to form distorted BrRb4Tl square pyramids that share a cornercorner with one BrRb4Tl square pyramid, corners with two equivalent BrRb4Tl trigonal bipyramids, edges with four equivalent BrRb4Tl square pyramids, and faces with four equivalent BrRb5Tl octahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on Rb21Tl7(Br21O4)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1693152

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗