Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1697295

Materials Data on Dy3(Al2Fe)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Dy3(FeAl2)2 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Dy sites. In the first Dy site, Dy is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Dy, four Fe, and eight Al atoms. There are a spread of Dy–Dy bond distances ranging from 3.28–3.37 Å. There are a spread of Dy–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.16–3.25 Å. There are a spread of Dy–Al bond distances ranging from 3.13–3.25 Å. In the second Dy site, Dy is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Dy, five Fe, and seven Al atoms. The Dy–Dy bond length is 3.24 Å. There are a spread of Dy–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.08–3.23 Å. There are a spread of Dy–Al bond distances ranging from 3.09–3.24 Å. In the third Dy site, Dy is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Dy, three equivalent Fe, and nine Al atoms. There are a spread of Dy–Dy bond distances ranging from 3.31–3.33 Å. There are a spread of Dy–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.19–3.21 Å. There are a spread of Dy–Al bond distances ranging from 3.13–3.22 Å. There are three inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to six Dy, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with fourteen AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. Both Fe–Fe bond lengths are 2.70 Å. There are two shorter (2.65 Å) and two longer (2.69 Å) Fe–Al bond lengths. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to six Dy and six Al atoms to form FeDy6Al6 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with ten AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with seventeen AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Al bond distances ranging from 2.69–2.74 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to six Dy, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight FeDy6Al6 cuboctahedra, corners with ten AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve AlDy6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra. There are two shorter (2.64 Å) and two longer (2.73 Å) Fe–Al bond lengths. There are five inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded to six Dy, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form distorted AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with five FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with thirteen AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve AlDy6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.72–2.79 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded to six Dy, three Fe, and three Al atoms to form distorted AlDy6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent AlDy6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra, faces with nine FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with nine AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. There are one shorter (2.71 Å) and one longer (2.76 Å) Al–Al bond lengths. In the third Al site, Al is bonded to six equivalent Dy, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeDy6Al6 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six equivalent FeDy6Al6 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. Both Al–Al bond lengths are 2.75 Å. In the fourth Al site, Al is bonded to six Dy, four Fe, and two equivalent Al atoms to form AlDy6Al2Fe4 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeDy6Al6 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six AlDy6Al2Fe4 cuboctahedra, faces with eight AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with ten FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. In the fifth Al site, Al is bonded to six Dy, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six AlDy6Al2Fe4 cuboctahedra, faces with seven FeDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with eleven AlDy6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-04. Materials Data on Dy3(Al2Fe)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1697295

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗