Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1700379

Materials Data on Rb2LuSi4O10F by Materials Project

Abstract

Rb2LuSi4O10F crystallizes in the monoclinic P2_1/m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Rb1+ sites. In the first Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to nine O2- and one F1- atom. There are a spread of Rb–O bond distances ranging from 2.98–3.37 Å. The Rb–F bond length is 3.01 Å. In the second Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to ten O2- atoms. There are a spread of Rb–O bond distances ranging from 2.91–3.35 Å. In the third Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to nine O2- and one F1- atom. There are a spread of Rb–O bond distances ranging from 2.95–3.47 Å. The Rb–F bond length is 3.03 Å. In the fourth Rb1+ site, Rb1+ is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to eight O2- and one F1- atom. There are a spread of Rb–O bond distances ranging from 2.99–3.48 Å. The Rb–F bond length is 3.20 Å. Lu3+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form LuO4F2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent LuO4F2 octahedra and corners with four SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 19–23°. There are a spread of Lu–O bond distances ranging from 2.18–2.21 Å. There are one shorter (2.17 Å) and one longer (2.22 Å) Lu–F bond lengths. There are four inequivalent Si4+ sites. In the first Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LuO4F2 octahedra and corners with three SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 36°. There are a spread of Si–O bond distances ranging from 1.60–1.66 Å. In the second Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LuO4F2 octahedra and corners with three SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 45°. There are a spread of Si–O bond distances ranging from 1.60–1.66 Å. In the third Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LuO4F2 octahedra and corners with three SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 12°. There is one shorter (1.59 Å) and three longer (1.65 Å) Si–O bond length. In the fourth Si4+ site, Si4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LuO4F2 octahedra and corners with three SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 48°. There are a spread of Si–O bond distances ranging from 1.60–1.67 Å. There are twelve inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a linear geometry to two equivalent Si4+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two Rb1+ and two equivalent Si4+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted bent 120 degrees geometry to two Rb1+ and two Si4+ atoms. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two equivalent Rb1+ and two Si4+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a bent 150 degrees geometry to one Rb1+ and two equivalent Si4+ atoms. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to two Rb1+ and two Si4+ atoms. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted bent 120 degrees geometry to two equivalent Rb1+ and two Si4+ atoms. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to one Rb1+ and two equivalent Si4+ atoms. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two Rb1+, one Lu3+, and one Si4+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Rb1+, one Lu3+, and one Si4+ atom. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Rb1+, one Lu3+, and one Si4+ atom. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted linear geometry to two Rb1+, one Lu3+, and one Si4+ atom. There are two inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to two Rb1+ and two equivalent Lu3+ atoms. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted bent 150 degrees geometry to one Rb1+ and two equivalent Lu3+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-01. Materials Data on Rb2LuSi4O10F by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1700379

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗