Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1707225

Materials Data on Er3(Al2Fe)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Er3(FeAl2)2 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Er sites. In the first Er site, Er is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Er, four Fe, and eight Al atoms. There are a spread of Er–Er bond distances ranging from 3.27–3.33 Å. There are a spread of Er–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.14–3.22 Å. There are a spread of Er–Al bond distances ranging from 3.11–3.22 Å. In the second Er site, Er is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Er, five Fe, and seven Al atoms. The Er–Er bond length is 3.21 Å. There are a spread of Er–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.06–3.21 Å. There are a spread of Er–Al bond distances ranging from 3.07–3.23 Å. In the third Er site, Er is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Er, three equivalent Fe, and nine Al atoms. There are a spread of Er–Er bond distances ranging from 3.29–3.31 Å. There are a spread of Er–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.15–3.19 Å. There are a spread of Er–Al bond distances ranging from 3.11–3.19 Å. There are three inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to six Er, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with fourteen AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. Both Fe–Fe bond lengths are 2.68 Å. There are two shorter (2.64 Å) and two longer (2.67 Å) Fe–Al bond lengths. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to six Er and six Al atoms to form FeEr6Al6 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with ten AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with seventeen AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Al bond distances ranging from 2.67–2.72 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to six Er, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight FeEr6Al6 cuboctahedra, corners with ten AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve AlEr6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra. There are two shorter (2.63 Å) and two longer (2.71 Å) Fe–Al bond lengths. There are five inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded to six Er, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form distorted AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with five FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with thirteen AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve AlEr6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Al–Al bond distances ranging from 2.70–2.78 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded to six Er, three Fe, and three Al atoms to form distorted AlEr6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent AlEr6Al3Fe3 cuboctahedra, faces with nine FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with nine AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. There are one shorter (2.69 Å) and one longer (2.75 Å) Al–Al bond lengths. In the third Al site, Al is bonded to six equivalent Er, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeEr6Al6 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six equivalent FeEr6Al6 cuboctahedra, and faces with twelve AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. Both Al–Al bond lengths are 2.73 Å. In the fourth Al site, Al is bonded to six Er, four Fe, and two equivalent Al atoms to form AlEr6Al2Fe4 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeEr6Al6 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six AlEr6Al2Fe4 cuboctahedra, faces with eight AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with ten FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra. In the fifth Al site, Al is bonded to six Er, two equivalent Fe, and four Al atoms to form AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with six FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with six AlEr6Al2Fe4 cuboctahedra, faces with seven FeEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with eleven AlEr6Al4Fe2 cuboctahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-05. Materials Data on Er3(Al2Fe)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1707225

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗