Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1709583

Materials Data on Zr2Cr3Fe by Materials Project

Abstract

Zr2Cr3Fe is Hexagonal Laves-derived structured and crystallizes in the orthorhombic Amm2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are seven inequivalent Zr sites. In the first Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, eight Cr, and four equivalent Fe atoms. There are a spread of Zr–Zr bond distances ranging from 3.03–3.09 Å. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.93–2.97 Å. All Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.94 Å. In the second Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, ten Cr, and two equivalent Fe atoms. There are two shorter (3.09 Å) and one longer (3.12 Å) Zr–Zr bond lengths. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.88–2.98 Å. Both Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.90 Å. In the third Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, ten Cr, and two equivalent Fe atoms. There are one shorter (3.06 Å) and two longer (3.09 Å) Zr–Zr bond lengths. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.88–2.98 Å. Both Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.90 Å. In the fourth Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, eight Cr, and four equivalent Fe atoms. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.93–2.97 Å. All Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.94 Å. In the fifth Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, eight Cr, and four equivalent Fe atoms. There are one shorter (3.03 Å) and one longer (3.06 Å) Zr–Zr bond lengths. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.93–2.97 Å. All Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.94 Å. In the sixth Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, ten Cr, and two equivalent Fe atoms. The Zr–Zr bond length is 3.12 Å. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.88–2.98 Å. Both Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.90 Å. In the seventh Zr site, Zr is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Zr, eight Cr, and four equivalent Fe atoms. There are a spread of Zr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.93–2.97 Å. All Zr–Fe bond lengths are 2.94 Å. There are four inequivalent Cr sites. In the first Cr site, Cr is bonded to six Zr, two equivalent Cr, and four equivalent Fe atoms to form CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra that share corners with eighteen CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra, edges with six CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra, faces with eight equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with ten CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra. Both Cr–Cr bond lengths are 2.50 Å. There are two shorter (2.47 Å) and two longer (2.56 Å) Cr–Fe bond lengths. In the second Cr site, Cr is bonded to six Zr and six Cr atoms to form CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra that share corners with six equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with sixteen CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Cr–Cr bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.57 Å. In the third Cr site, Cr is bonded to six Zr and six Cr atoms to form CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra that share corners with eight equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with ten CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra, edges with six CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with fourteen CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra. Both Cr–Cr bond lengths are 2.52 Å. In the fourth Cr site, Cr is bonded to six Zr, four Cr, and two equivalent Fe atoms to form CrZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with eight CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra, edges with six equivalent CrZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, faces with six equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with fourteen CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra. Both Cr–Fe bond lengths are 2.50 Å. Fe is bonded to six Zr, four Cr, and two equivalent Fe atoms to form distorted FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, edges with four equivalent CrZr6Cr6 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent FeZr6Cr4Fe2 cuboctahedra, and faces with fourteen CrZr6Cr2Fe4 cuboctahedra. There are one shorter (2.52 Å) and one longer (2.57 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-05. Materials Data on Zr2Cr3Fe by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1709583

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗