Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1713792

Materials Data on LiCeMg14 by Materials Project

Abstract

LiMg14Ce crystallizes in the orthorhombic Amm2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Li is bonded to ten Mg and two equivalent Ce atoms to form LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra that share corners with six equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve MgMg12 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with sixteen MgLiCeMg10 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Li–Mg bond distances ranging from 3.19–3.30 Å. Both Li–Ce bond lengths are 3.21 Å. There are seven inequivalent Mg sites. In the first Mg site, Mg is bonded to twelve Mg atoms to form MgMg12 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, edges with eighteen MgLiCeMg10 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Mg–Mg bond distances ranging from 3.17–3.26 Å. In the second Mg site, Mg is bonded to twelve Mg atoms to form MgMg12 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, corners with fourteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, edges with eighteen MgCeMg11 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Mg–Mg bond distances ranging from 3.18–3.25 Å. In the third Mg site, Mg is bonded to two equivalent Li, eight Mg, and two equivalent Ce atoms to form distorted MgLi2Ce2Mg8 cuboctahedra that share corners with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with fourteen MgLi2Ce2Mg8 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with sixteen MgLi2Ce2Mg8 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Mg–Mg bond distances ranging from 3.16–3.27 Å. Both Mg–Ce bond lengths are 3.25 Å. In the fourth Mg site, Mg is bonded to twelve Mg atoms to form MgMg12 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, corners with four equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, corners with ten MgLi2Ce2Mg8 cuboctahedra, edges with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, and faces with twenty MgMg12 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Mg–Mg bond distances ranging from 3.16–3.23 Å. In the fifth Mg site, Mg is bonded to one Li, ten Mg, and one Ce atom to form distorted MgLiCeMg10 cuboctahedra that share corners with eighteen MgCeMg11 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with fourteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Mg–Mg bond distances ranging from 3.18–3.27 Å. The Mg–Ce bond length is 3.23 Å. In the sixth Mg site, Mg is bonded to one Li and eleven Mg atoms to form distorted MgLiMg11 cuboctahedra that share corners with eighteen MgCeMg11 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with sixteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, faces with three equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with sixteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra. Both Mg–Mg bond lengths are 3.22 Å. In the seventh Mg site, Mg is bonded to eleven Mg and one Ce atom to form MgCeMg11 cuboctahedra that share corners with eighteen MgCeMg11 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with sixteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra, a faceface with one CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, faces with three equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with sixteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra. The Mg–Ce bond length is 3.24 Å. Ce is bonded to two equivalent Li and ten Mg atoms to form CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra that share corners with six equivalent CeLi2Mg10 cuboctahedra, corners with twelve MgMg12 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, edges with sixteen MgCeMg11 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent LiCe2Mg10 cuboctahedra, and faces with eighteen MgMg12 cuboctahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on LiCeMg14 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1713792

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗