Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1714833

Materials Data on Sm4ZrFe33 by Materials Project

Abstract

Sm4ZrFe33 crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Sm sites. In the first Sm site, Sm is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to one Zr and eighteen Fe atoms. The Sm–Zr bond length is 3.22 Å. There are a spread of Sm–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.01–3.46 Å. In the second Sm site, Sm is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to nineteen Fe atoms. There are a spread of Sm–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.05–3.30 Å. In the third Sm site, Sm is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to nineteen Fe atoms. There are a spread of Sm–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.03–3.29 Å. In the fourth Sm site, Sm is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to nineteen Fe atoms. There are a spread of Sm–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.98–3.32 Å. Zr is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to one Sm and thirteen Fe atoms. There are a spread of Zr–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.51–2.89 Å. There are twenty-one inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm and nine Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3Fe9 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.45–2.66 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm and nine Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3Fe9 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.46–2.66 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm and nine Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3Fe9 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.44–2.67 Å. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm and nine Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3Fe9 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.47–2.65 Å. In the fifth Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm, one Zr, and eight Fe atoms to form a mixture of distorted face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3ZrFe8 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.54–2.67 Å. In the sixth Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm and nine Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3Fe9 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.46–2.67 Å. In the seventh Fe site, Fe is bonded to three Sm and nine Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm3Fe9 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.47–2.66 Å. In the eighth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to three Sm, one Zr, and eight Fe atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.54–2.58 Å. In the ninth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm, one Zr, and nine Fe atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.45–2.59 Å. In the tenth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two Sm and ten Fe atoms to form a mixture of distorted face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm2Fe10 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.46–2.60 Å. In the eleventh Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm, one Zr, and nine Fe atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.44–2.54 Å. In the twelfth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two Sm and ten Fe atoms to form a mixture of face, edge, and corner-sharing FeSm2Fe10 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.44–2.63 Å. In the thirteenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to two Sm, one Zr, and eight Fe atoms. There are one shorter (2.59 Å) and one longer (2.61 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. In the fourteenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm and ten Fe atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.79 Å. In the fifteenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm and ten Fe atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.50–2.78 Å. In the sixteenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm, one Zr, and nine Fe atoms. There are one shorter (2.57 Å) and one longer (2.83 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. In the seventeenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm, one Zr, and eight Fe atoms. The Fe–Fe bond length is 2.59 Å. In the eighteenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Sm and ten Fe atoms. There are one shorter (2.51 Å) and two longer (2.75 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. In the nineteenth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to one Sm and thirteen Fe atoms. The Fe–Fe bond length is 2.41 Å. In the twentieth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to one Sm and thirteen Fe atoms. In the twenty-first Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to one Sm, one Zr, and eight Fe atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-05. Materials Data on Sm4ZrFe33 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1714833

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗