Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1720657

Materials Data on LiSmEu2O4 by Materials Project

Abstract

LiEu2SmO4 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pmc2_1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one SmO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids, corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SmO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, and an edgeedge with one EuO6 pentagonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 2°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–2.06 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one SmO6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SmO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, and edges with two equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 2°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–2.07 Å. There are four inequivalent Eu2+ sites. In the first Eu2+ site, Eu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted EuO6 pentagonal pyramids that share corners with three SmO6 octahedra, corners with four EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SmO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one EuO7 pentagonal bipyramid, edges with two equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids, and edges with three LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 33–75°. There are a spread of Eu–O bond distances ranging from 2.53–2.64 Å. In the second Eu2+ site, Eu2+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Eu–O bond distances ranging from 2.54–2.65 Å. In the third Eu2+ site, Eu2+ is bonded to seven O2- atoms to form distorted EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids that share corners with four equivalent SmO6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with four SmO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, an edgeedge with one EuO6 pentagonal pyramid, edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and faces with two equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 12–17°. There are a spread of Eu–O bond distances ranging from 2.62–2.72 Å. In the fourth Eu2+ site, Eu2+ is bonded to seven O2- atoms to form distorted EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids that share corners with four equivalent SmO6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids, edges with four SmO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and faces with two equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 12–17°. There are a spread of Eu–O bond distances ranging from 2.62–2.72 Å. There are two inequivalent Sm3+ sites. In the first Sm3+ site, Sm3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form SmO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, a cornercorner with one EuO6 pentagonal pyramid, a cornercorner with one LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SmO6 octahedra, edges with four EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, and edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Sm–O bond distances ranging from 2.32–2.40 Å. In the second Sm3+ site, Sm3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form SmO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, corners with two equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids, a cornercorner with one LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SmO6 octahedra, edges with four EuO7 pentagonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent EuO6 pentagonal pyramids, and edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Sm–O bond distances ranging from 2.31–2.40 Å. There are eight inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, four Eu2+, and one Sm3+ atom to form distorted OLiSmEu4 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OSm2Eu3 square pyramids, edges with two equivalent OLiSmEu4 octahedra, and edges with three OSm2Eu3 square pyramids. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, four Eu2+, and one Sm3+ atom to form distorted OLiSmEu4 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent OSm2Eu3 square pyramids, edges with two equivalent OLiSmEu4 octahedra, and edges with three OSm2Eu3 square pyramids. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Li1+, three Eu2+, and one Sm3+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Li1+, three Eu2+, and one Sm3+ atom. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Eu2+ and two equivalent Sm3+ atoms to form distorted OSm2Eu3 square pyramids that share corners with two equivalent OLiSmEu4 octahedra, edges with three OLiSmEu4 octahedra, and edges with four OSm2Eu3 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 20°. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Eu2+ and two equivalent Sm3+ atoms to form distorted OSm2Eu3 square pyramids that share corners with two equivalent OLiSmEu4 octahedra, edges with three OLiSmEu4 octahedra, and edges with four OSm2Eu3 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 19°. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, three Eu2+, and two equivalent Sm3+ atoms. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, three Eu2+, and two equivalent Sm3+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on LiSmEu2O4 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1720657

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗