Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1738123

Materials Data on Ce2Fe20Si2C by Materials Project

Abstract

Ce2Fe20Si2C crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Ce is bonded in a distorted single-bond geometry to sixteen Fe and one C atom. There are a spread of Ce–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.07–3.48 Å. The Ce–C bond length is 2.63 Å. There are eleven inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce, ten Fe, and two Si atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.61–2.73 Å. There are one shorter (2.58 Å) and one longer (2.65 Å) Fe–Si bond lengths. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce, nine Fe, and one Si atom. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.46–2.65 Å. The Fe–Si bond length is 2.41 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce, eight Fe, and two Si atoms. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.47–2.63 Å. There are one shorter (2.41 Å) and one longer (2.42 Å) Fe–Si bond lengths. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce, nine Fe, and one Si atom. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.43–2.69 Å. The Fe–Si bond length is 2.40 Å. In the fifth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent Ce and ten Fe atoms to form distorted FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra that share corners with three FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra, corners with two equivalent CCe2Fe4 octahedra, an edgeedge with one CCe2Fe4 octahedra, and faces with two FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 28–71°. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.40–2.65 Å. In the sixth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a single-bond geometry to eight Fe and one C atom. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.39–2.56 Å. The Fe–C bond length is 1.86 Å. In the seventh Fe site, Fe is bonded in a single-bond geometry to seven Fe, one Si, and one C atom. There are a spread of Fe–Fe bond distances ranging from 2.38–2.59 Å. The Fe–Si bond length is 2.38 Å. The Fe–C bond length is 1.87 Å. In the eighth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce, eight Fe, and two Si atoms. The Fe–Fe bond length is 2.57 Å. There are one shorter (2.39 Å) and one longer (2.41 Å) Fe–Si bond lengths. In the ninth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce, nine Fe, and one Si atom. The Fe–Fe bond length is 2.39 Å. The Fe–Si bond length is 2.39 Å. In the tenth Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent Ce and ten Fe atoms to form distorted FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra, and faces with two equivalent CCe2Fe4 octahedra. In the eleventh Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Ce and ten Fe atoms. There are two inequivalent Si sites. In the first Si site, Si is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to ten Fe atoms. In the second Si site, Si is bonded in a 10-coordinate geometry to ten Fe atoms. C is bonded to two equivalent Ce and four Fe atoms to form CCe2Fe4 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra, and faces with two equivalent FeCe2Fe10 cuboctahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-04. Materials Data on Ce2Fe20Si2C by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1738123

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗