Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1739610

Materials Data on NaLiAl4(SiO6)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

NaLiAl4(SiO6)2 crystallizes in the monoclinic Cc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Na is bonded to six O atoms to form NaO6 octahedra that share corners with six AlO4 tetrahedra and corners with six SiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Na–O bond distances ranging from 2.54–2.66 Å. Li is bonded to six O atoms to form distorted LiO6 octahedra that share corners with two AlO4 tetrahedra, corners with two SiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with six AlO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.19–2.29 Å. There are four inequivalent Al sites. In the first Al site, Al is bonded to six O atoms to form distorted AlO6 octahedra that share corners with two AlO4 tetrahedra, corners with two SiO4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent LiO6 octahedra, and edges with three equivalent AlO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Al–O bond distances ranging from 1.81–2.01 Å. In the second Al site, Al is bonded to six O atoms to form AlO6 octahedra that share corners with two AlO4 tetrahedra, corners with two SiO4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent LiO6 octahedra, and edges with three equivalent AlO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Al–O bond distances ranging from 1.86–1.92 Å. In the third Al site, Al is bonded to four O atoms to form AlO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, corners with two AlO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent NaO6 octahedra, and corners with three equivalent SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–69°. There are a spread of Al–O bond distances ranging from 1.75–1.80 Å. In the fourth Al site, Al is bonded to four O atoms to form AlO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, corners with two AlO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent NaO6 octahedra, and corners with three equivalent SiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 54–70°. There are a spread of Al–O bond distances ranging from 1.75–1.80 Å. There are two inequivalent Si sites. In the first Si site, Si is bonded to four O atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, corners with two AlO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent NaO6 octahedra, and corners with three equivalent AlO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–66°. There are a spread of Si–O bond distances ranging from 1.62–1.70 Å. In the second Si site, Si is bonded to four O atoms to form SiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, corners with two AlO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent NaO6 octahedra, and corners with three equivalent AlO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–65°. There is three shorter (1.63 Å) and one longer (1.70 Å) Si–O bond length. There are twelve inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Na, one Al, and one Si atom. In the second O site, O is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to one Na, one Al, and one Si atom. In the third O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Al, and one Si atom. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Na, one Al, and one Si atom. In the fifth O site, O is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li, two Al, and one O atom. The O–O bond length is 1.58 Å. In the sixth O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Na, one Al, and one Si atom. In the seventh O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li and three Al atoms. In the eighth O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry to one Li and three Al atoms. In the ninth O site, O is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li, two Al, and one O atom. In the tenth O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Na, one Al, and one Si atom. In the eleventh O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Al, and one Si atom. In the twelfth O site, O is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Na, one Al, and one Si atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on NaLiAl4(SiO6)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1739610

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗