Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1741470

Materials Data on Tm(FeGe)6 by Materials Project

Abstract

Tm(FeGe)6 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Immm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Tm sites. In the first Tm site, Tm is bonded to twelve Fe and eight Ge atoms to form distorted TmFe12Ge8 hexagonal bipyramids that share corners with four equivalent TmFe12Ge8 hexagonal bipyramids, faces with eight equivalent FeTm2Fe4Ge6 cuboctahedra, and faces with four TmFe12Ge8 hexagonal bipyramids. There are a spread of Tm–Fe bond distances ranging from 3.24–3.28 Å. There are a spread of Tm–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.81–2.98 Å. In the second Tm site, Tm is bonded to twelve Fe and eight Ge atoms to form distorted face-sharing TmFe12Ge8 hexagonal bipyramids. There are eight shorter (3.26 Å) and four longer (3.27 Å) Tm–Fe bond lengths. There are a spread of Tm–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.98 Å. There are four inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Tm, four equivalent Fe, and six Ge atoms. All Fe–Fe bond lengths are 2.56 Å. There are four shorter (2.50 Å) and two longer (2.68 Å) Fe–Ge bond lengths. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to two equivalent Tm, four Fe, and six Ge atoms to form distorted FeTm2Fe4Ge6 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent FeTm2Fe4Ge6 cuboctahedra, edges with two equivalent FeTm2Fe4Ge6 cuboctahedra, faces with four equivalent FeTm2Fe4Ge6 cuboctahedra, and faces with four equivalent TmFe12Ge8 hexagonal bipyramids. There are two shorter (2.56 Å) and two longer (2.57 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. There are a spread of Fe–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.50–2.68 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Tm, four Fe, and six Ge atoms. Both Fe–Fe bond lengths are 2.55 Å. There are a spread of Fe–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.48–2.68 Å. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to two Tm, four Fe, and six Ge atoms. There are one shorter (2.56 Å) and one longer (2.57 Å) Fe–Fe bond lengths. There are a spread of Fe–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.51–2.67 Å. There are nine inequivalent Ge sites. In the first Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to three Tm and six Fe atoms. In the second Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Fe atoms. In the third Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to three Tm and six Fe atoms. In the fourth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six Fe atoms. In the fifth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Tm and six Fe atoms. In the sixth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to one Tm and six Fe atoms. In the seventh Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to one Tm, six Fe, and one Ge atom. The Ge–Tm bond length is 2.80 Å. All Ge–Fe bond lengths are 2.67 Å. The Ge–Ge bond length is 2.50 Å. In the eighth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to one Tm, six Fe, and one Ge atom. Both Ge–Fe bond lengths are 2.68 Å. The Ge–Ge bond length is 2.50 Å. In the ninth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to one Tm, six Fe, and one Ge atom. The Ge–Ge bond length is 2.49 Å.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-03. Materials Data on Tm(FeGe)6 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1741470

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗