Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1742024

Materials Data on Li2Co3TeO8 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2Co3TeO8 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent CoO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 10–15°. There are four shorter (2.21 Å) and two longer (2.28 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent CoO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 9–17°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.10–2.24 Å. There are three inequivalent Co+3.33+ sites. In the first Co+3.33+ site, Co+3.33+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–2.15 Å. In the second Co+3.33+ site, Co+3.33+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 9–17°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 2.10–2.13 Å. In the third Co+3.33+ site, Co+3.33+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with six equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 10–15°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.14 Å. Te4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TeO6 octahedra that share edges with four LiO6 octahedra and edges with six CoO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Te–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–1.98 Å. There are four inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+ and three Co+3.33+ atoms to form OLi2Co3 square pyramids that share corners with five equivalent OLi2Co3 square pyramids and edges with four equivalent OLi2Co2Te square pyramids. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two Co+3.33+, and one Te4+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two Co+3.33+, and one Te4+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, two Co+3.33+, and one Te4+ atom to form OLi2Co2Te square pyramids that share corners with five equivalent OLi2Co2Te square pyramids and edges with four equivalent OLi2Co3 square pyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-04. Materials Data on Li2Co3TeO8 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1742024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗