Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1746204

Materials Data on Li6Cu(B2O5)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li6CuB4O10 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are nine inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.07 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.05 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.51 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuO5 square pyramid, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, and a cornercorner with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.11 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra and an edgeedge with one CuO5 square pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.06 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuO5 square pyramid, corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid, edges with two LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.18 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.01 Å. In the eighth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.60 Å. In the ninth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with two LiO4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid, an edgeedge with one CuO5 square pyramid, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.10 Å. There are two inequivalent Cu2+ sites. In the first Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded in a square co-planar geometry to four O2- atoms. There is two shorter (1.94 Å) and two longer (2.02 Å) Cu–O bond length. In the second Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to five O2- atoms to form distorted CuO5 square pyramids that share corners with two LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.71 Å. There are six inequivalent B3+ sites. In the first B3+ site, B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O2- atoms. There is two shorter (1.37 Å) and one longer (1.44 Å) B–O bond length. In the second B3+ site, B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O2- atoms. There is two shorter (1.36 Å) and one longer (1.44 Å) B–O bond length. In the third B3+ site, B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O2- atoms. There are a spread of B–O bond distances ranging from 1.35–1.42 Å. In the fourth B3+ site, B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O2- atoms. There are a spread of B–O bond distances ranging from 1.36–1.44 Å. In the fifth B3+ site, B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O2- atoms. There are a spread of B–O bond distances ranging from 1.36–1.43 Å. In the sixth B3+ site, B3+ is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three O2- atoms. There are a spread of B–O bond distances ranging from 1.36–1.43 Å. There are fifteen inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one B3+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Cu2+, and one B3+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Cu2+, and two B3+ atoms. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Cu2+, and one B3+ atom to form distorted OLi2CuB tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi2CuB tetrahedra and a cornercorner with one OLi4B trigonal bipyramid. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one B3+ atom. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to two Li1+, one Cu2+, and one B3+ atom. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, one Cu2+, and one B3+ atom. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one B3+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to two equivalent Li1+ and two B3+ atoms. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and one B3+ atom to form distorted OLi4B trigonal bipyramids that share corners with two equivalent OLi2CuB tetrahedra and an edgeedge with one OLi4B trigonal bipyramid. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and one B3+ atom to form distorted OLi4B trigonal bipyramids that share corners with two OLi2CuB tetrahedra and an edgeedge with one OLi4B trigonal bipyramid. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+ and two B3+ atoms. In the thirteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Cu2+, and one B3+ atom to form distorted OLi2CuB tetrahedra that share corners with three OLi4B trigonal bipyramids and a cornercorner with one OLi2CuB trigonal pyramid. In the fourteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and one B3+ atom. In the fifteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Cu2+, and one B3+ atom to form distorted corner-sharing OLi2CuB trigonal pyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-01. Materials Data on Li6Cu(B2O5)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1746204

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗