Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1750515

Materials Data on Li5Ga(GeO4)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li5Ga(GeO4)2 is beta beryllia-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic P2_1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are five inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, corners with four GeO4 tetrahedra, and edges with two LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.09 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four GeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one GaO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.20 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, corners with four GeO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–2.06 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four GeO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–1.99 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, corners with four GeO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.06 Å. Ga3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form GaO4 tetrahedra that share corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with four GeO4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. There are a spread of Ga–O bond distances ranging from 1.87–1.89 Å. There are two inequivalent Ge4+ sites. In the first Ge4+ site, Ge4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form GeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, and corners with four LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Ge–O bond distances ranging from 1.74–1.85 Å. In the second Ge4+ site, Ge4+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form GeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent GaO4 tetrahedra, corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, and corners with four LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Ge–O bond distances ranging from 1.73–1.84 Å. There are eight inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Ga3+, and one Ge4+ atom to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi2GaGe trigonal pyramids. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and one Ge4+ atom to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi3Ge trigonal pyramids. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Ga3+, and one Ge4+ atom to form OLi2GaGe tetrahedra that share corners with eight OLi2GaGe tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent OLi2GaGe trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi3Ge trigonal pyramid. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Ga3+, and one Ge4+ atom to form OLi2GaGe tetrahedra that share corners with eight OLi2GaGe tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent OLi3Ge trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi2GaGe trigonal pyramid. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and one Ge4+ atom to form OLi3Ge tetrahedra that share corners with eight OLi2GaGe tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent OLi3Ge trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi2GaGe trigonal pyramid. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and one Ge4+ atom to form OLi3Ge tetrahedra that share corners with eight OLi2GaGe tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent OLi2GaGe trigonal pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi3Ge trigonal pyramid. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Ga3+, and one Ge4+ atom to form corner-sharing OLi2GaGe tetrahedra. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and one Ge4+ atom to form corner-sharing OLi3Ge tetrahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on Li5Ga(GeO4)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1750515

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗