Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1750666

Materials Data on Sr12Ru11O36 by Materials Project

Abstract

Sr12Ru11O36 is Orthorhombic Perovskite-like structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic P2_1/c space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are six inequivalent Sr2+ sites. In the first Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to seven O2- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–O bond distances ranging from 2.44–2.99 Å. In the second Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eleven O2- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–O bond distances ranging from 2.49–3.09 Å. In the third Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to seven O2- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–O bond distances ranging from 2.45–2.97 Å. In the fourth Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to seven O2- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–O bond distances ranging from 2.44–2.87 Å. In the fifth Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to five O2- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–O bond distances ranging from 2.48–2.59 Å. In the sixth Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to eleven O2- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–O bond distances ranging from 2.55–2.99 Å. There are seven inequivalent Ru+4.36+ sites. In the first Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form corner-sharing RuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 20–29°. There are a spread of Ru–O bond distances ranging from 1.84–2.06 Å. In the second Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form RuO6 octahedra that share corners with four RuO6 octahedra and corners with two equivalent RuO5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 19–28°. There are a spread of Ru–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.06 Å. In the third Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form RuO6 octahedra that share corners with four RuO6 octahedra and corners with two equivalent RuO5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 18–29°. There are a spread of Ru–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.06 Å. In the fourth Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form corner-sharing RuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 21–28°. There are a spread of Ru–O bond distances ranging from 1.84–2.06 Å. In the fifth Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form corner-sharing RuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 20–25°. There are two shorter (1.99 Å) and four longer (2.04 Å) Ru–O bond lengths. In the sixth Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form RuO6 octahedra that share corners with five RuO6 octahedra and a cornercorner with one RuO5 square pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 18–25°. There are a spread of Ru–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.07 Å. In the seventh Ru+4.36+ site, Ru+4.36+ is bonded to five O2- atoms to form corner-sharing RuO5 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 5–29°. There are a spread of Ru–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.03 Å. There are eighteen inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to two Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and one Ru+4.36+ atom. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the thirteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the fourteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the fifteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and one Ru+4.36+ atom. In the sixteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the seventeenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to three Sr2+ and two Ru+4.36+ atoms. In the eighteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 1-coordinate geometry to one Sr2+ and one O2- atom. The O–O bond length is 1.29 Å.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on Sr12Ru11O36 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1750666

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗