Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1812628

DAP: Cosmic Plastics D33/6120 vs. Sumitomo Bakelite 52-01

Weaver, Leeson Scott·Fisher, Kane J.
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As soon as you lay eyes on the two data sheets for these materials, Cosmic D33/6120 and Sumitomo Bakelite 52-01, there are some pretty clear differences in mechanical, thermal, electrical, and physical properties. There are three distinct hypotheses relating to why the plastics are so distinctly different from one another: 1. unique composition; 2. different molding procedure; and 3. separate molding parameters A closer look into each of these hypotheses is necessary in explaining why the Sumitomo Bakelite and Cosmic DAPs are so different from one another.

Explore related subjects

36 MATERIALS SCIENCECosmic Plastics DAPDiallyl phthalateSumitomo Bakelite DAP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Weaver, Leeson Scott, Fisher, Kane J.. 2021-06-23. DAP: Cosmic Plastics D33/6120 vs. Sumitomo Bakelite 52-01. https://doi.org/10.2172/1812628

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗