Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1823591

First Principles Predictions of SnO2/CdTe and SnO2/CdCl2/CdTe Interface Structures

Abstract

Interfaces become increasingly the limiting factor of solar cell efficiency, raising the interest in computational models. However, explicit atomic structure models from microscopy are rare, and hypothetical assumptions about the atomic structure become ambiguous for incoherent or highly lattice mismatched interfaces. Adopting a bulk crystal structure prediction algorithm to interfacial systems enables explicit structure models for the bare and CdCl 2 treated SnO 2 /CdTe interface.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lany, Stephan (ORCID:0000000281278885), Sharan, Abhishek. 2021-08-26. First Principles Predictions of SnO2/CdTe and SnO2/CdCl2/CdTe Interface Structures. https://doi.org/10.1109/pvsc43889.2021.9518834

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

A first principles study on the adsorbate-adsorbate interactions on the CdTe(111) surface with Cd, Te, Zn, and Se adatoms

The study of adsorbate-adsorbate interactions is essential to understanding early crystal growth dynamics. Here, we employ planewave density functional theory to study the binary adatom pair interactions between Cd-Cd, Te-Te, Zn-Zn, Se-Se, Cd-Te, Cd-Se, Cd-Zn, Te-Se, Te-Zn, and Se-Zn adatom pairs on two CdTe(111) surfaces. An analysis of the interaction energies between binary adatom pairs suggests repulsive interactions are common regardless of the relative distance between adatoms. For the CdTe(111)A surface, attractive interactions occur between neighboring chalcogen (i.e., Te and Se) and Group 12 (i.e., Cd and Zn) adatom pairs. For the CdTe(111)B surface, attractive interactions occur between neighboring Group 12 adatoms forming a surface dimer configuration. Furthermore, the formation energy of an adatom pair is decomposed in terms of the electronic, elastic, and adatom binding contributions. For smaller interatomic distances between the adatoms, the formation energy is primarily a function of the electronic interactions, with null contributions from the elastic and adatom binding interactions for Group 12-containing pairs. Because of the less favorable electronic interactions for larger interatomic distances between the adatoms, the formation energies are typically more positive. Lastly, neighboring adatoms significantly increase the barriers of migration on the CdTe(111)A surface relative to unary adatoms for the top-to-fcc and fcc-to-fcc sites, while the migration barriers on the CdTe(111)B surface only increases for the fcc-to-fcc migration of chalcogen species. From this analysis, we illustrate the role of adatom interactions during the early stages of the surface nucleation processes on CdTe(111) thin films.

CdTe↗

First principles investigation of dopants and defect complexes in CdSe$_x$Te$_{1-x}$

Se alloying is a common approach to improve the performance of CdTe solar cells by tuning the bandgap, defect levels, and carrier density. A fundamental understanding of these improvements, specifically the effect of Se alloying on the behavior of defects and dopants in CdTe, remains unclear. Here, in this work, we present a density functional theory (DFT) study of point defect energetics in CdTe and CdSe x Te 1-x with x = 0.25, leading to a comparison of how native defects, dopants (As and Cu), impurities (Cl and O), and related defect complexes behave in CdTe vs CdSe x Te 1-x . Our calculations, performed by combining semi-local and nonlocal hybrid functionals, show a general lowering of the formation energies of native defects as well as substitutional defects formed by As and Cl upon Se addition. For successful p-type doping with As, destabilizing Cl-based defects in the CdSeTe lattice would be essential. We find evidence for some low-energy defect complexes of As, Cl, and O in CdSe 0.25 Te 0.75 . The computed defect formation energies further enable estimates of temperature-dependent defect concentrations and self-consistent Fermi levels. A comparison of defect energetics with the energies of impurity phases reveals that As, Cu, Cl, and O overwhelmingly prefer being segregated to unwanted As 2 O 5 , AsCl 3 , Cd 2 AsCl 2 , and CuO x phases rather than remain at defect sites, but such segregation is less likely to happen in CdSe 0.25 Te 0.75 than in CdTe. Overall, our work presents a list of likely defects and complexes in CdTe and Se-incorporated CdTe, paving the way to explain and mitigate limited dopant activation in experimental observations.

CdTe↗

Bias‐Dependent Quantum Efficiency Reveals Recombination Pathways in Thin Film Solar Cells

Identifying where recombination predominantly occurs—whether at the front interface, back interface, or throughout the bulk—is crucial for optimizing CdSeTe solar cells and many other photovoltaic device architectures. Here, a simple and effective diagnostic is demonstrated: measuring external quantum efficiency (QE) under varying forward biases. The drift–diffusion simulations reveal that each recombination pathway leaves a distinct bias-induced signature in the normalized QE: a progressive drop at long wavelengths for back-limited devices, a short-wavelength decline for front-limited devices, and a relatively uniform decrease across all wavelengths for bulk-limited devices. These predictions are validated with experiments on As-doped and Cu-doped CdSeTe devices, with and without passivation layers or different front buffers. In each case, the observed bias-dependent QE spectral changes align with the simulated recombination map. Because this method uses standard QE instrumentation, it offers a broadly accessible and cost-efficient means to diagnose recombination pathways—extending beyond CdSeTe to other thin-film and emerging solar cell technologies. By pinpointing recombination bottlenecks, researchers and manufacturers can strategically refine doping profiles, passivation schemes, and interface designs to further improve device performance.

CdTe↗