Evaluation of LPBF Steels for Nuclear Applications

Abstract

This report provides an update on the prioritization of existing reactor materials for advanced manufacturing. This report is a Milestone 3 deliverable in FY2023, under work package CT-23AN130401 to support research and qualification activities supported by the Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies (AMMT) program here at Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). The focus of FY23 for ANL included the determination of a decision criteria matrix for the prioritization of existing materials, the literature review of a select few Fe-based alloys, and working with vendors to obtain customized powders. The work package also includes fabricating test samples in a Renishaw AM400 Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) system and optimizing the process parameters. The major outcomes of this work package are: With collaborations from PNNL, ORNL, and INL, we were able to establish a decision criteria matrix containing a total of 6 categories and 31 different criteria. These will be used to downselect alloys for further evaluation; As part of that, 6 different Fe-based alloys were selected, 3 austenitic stainless steels (A709, D9, AFA) and 3 ferritic/martensitic steels (HT9, Grade 91, Grade 92). Customized powders were obtained from vendors in small quantities to fabricate initial prints to check printability of these specific alloys; A total of 72 single track experiments were performed on two alloy systems, 1 austenitic stainless steel (A709) and 1 ferritic/martensitic steel (Grade 91) in order to optimize the process parameters for the full 3d prints. The optimization led to the selection of 20 different processing conditions, 10 for each class of alloys; D9 and AFA alloys showed extensive cracking and porosity in the samples. This was due to less-than-ideal conditions present in the chamber during the deposition. A709 printed using the same process parameters showed almost fully dense samples with no noticeable porosity or any other defects. SEM and EBSD analysis revealed single phase FCC microstructure with cellular structure within the grains; HT9, Grade 91, Grade 92 alloys also showed no noticeable signs of cracking and ImageJ analysis showed porosity <0.5% in all conditions. While Grade 91 and Grade 92 showed single phase BCC microstructures, the presence of martensite laths was noted in HT9 alloy; Future work will include further characterization of these alloys to better understand the microstructural evolution during the 3d printing process.