Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 2202794

Panel Session 3A: Do Non-Conventional Geothermal Developments Need a Specialized Legal Framework?

Martinez Smith, Faith
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This presentation was given as part of a panel session at GRC 2023 entitled: Do Non-Conventional Geothermal Developments Need a Specialized Legal Framework? The presentation includes an overview an NREL publication titled, "Topics and Considerations for Developing State Geothermal Regulations," in addition to specific considerations as related to EGS/AGS technologies with relevant state and U.S. Federal statute examples.

Explore related subjects

advanced geothermal systemsENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY,GEOTHERMAL ENERGYenhanced geothermal systemsgeothermal direct-usegeothermal energygeothermal powerpolicy and regulatory analysis

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Martinez Smith, Faith. 2023-10-12. Panel Session 3A: Do Non-Conventional Geothermal Developments Need a Specialized Legal Framework?. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2202794

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2025

Influence of Reservoir Convection on Heat Extraction with Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems

Over the past few years, advancements in closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGS), also called advanced geothermal systems (AGS), have sparked a renewed interest in these types of designs. CLGS have certain advantages over traditional and enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), including not requiring in-situ reservoir permeability, conservation of the circulating fluid, and allowing for different fluids, including working fluids directly driving a turbine at the surface. CLGS may be attractive in environments where water resources are limited, rock contaminants must be avoided, and stimulation treatments are not available (e.g., due to regulatory or technical reasons). Despite these advantages, CLGS have some challenges, including limited surface area for heat transfer and requiring long wellbores and laterals to obtain multi-MW output in conduction-only reservoirs. CLGS have been investigated in conduction-only systems. In this paper, we explore the impact of both forced and natural convection on the levels of heat extraction with a CLGS deployed in a hot wet rock reservoir. We bound potential benefits of convection by investigating liquid reservoirs over a range of natural and forced convective coefficients. Additionally, we investigate the effects of permeability, porosity, and geothermal temperature gradient in the reservoir on CLGS outputs. Reservoir simulations indicate that reservoir permeabilities of at least ~100 mD are required for natural convection to increase the heat output with respect to a conduction-only scenario. The impact increases with increasing reservoir temperature. When subject to a forced convection flow field, Darcy velocities of at least 10-7 m/s are required to obtain an increase in heat output.

advanced geothermal systems↗
DOE OSTI2024

Evaluating Heat Extraction Performance of Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems with Thermally Conductive Enhancements in Conduction-Only Reservoirs: Preprint

We investigated the impact of disc-shaped and linear thermal enhancements on performance of closed-loop geothermal systems using steady-state and transient COMSOL numerical simulations. Thermal enhancements refer to thermally conductive material introduced in the rocks surrounding a wellbore to compensate for the relatively low rock thermal conductivity and increase heat extraction. Materials proposed include composite cements with thermally conductive additives such as metals or graphite to obtain overall cement thermal conductivities of 10 to 100x the rock thermal conductivity. Our simulation approach was modeling a subsegment (e.g., 100 m long) of a wellbore with idealized (e.g., perfect disc-shaped) thermal enhancements, and we report results as relative increase in heat extraction with respect to systems without thermal enhancements. We did not evaluate technical feasibility or cost of installing thermal enhancements. Simulations indicate that for 5-mm thick disc-shaped thermal enhancements with 5-m radius, repeated every 1 m along the wellbore and with thermal conductivity of 100x the rock thermal conductivity, the thermal output increases roughly 20% with respect to a closed-loop system without thermal enhancements. For fishbone structure thermal enhancements, we estimate a roughly 7% increase in thermal output for 5-m long radially outward pipes with half the radius of the main wellbore, repeated every 2.5 m, with thermal conductivity of 100x the rock thermal conductivity.

advanced geothermal systems↗