Magnification Determination for AGHCF Metallographic Images

Abstract

Metallographic images generated in the Alpha Gamma Hot Cell Facility (AGHCF) have been used for quantitative and qualitative characterization of irradiated metallic fuel pins. Individual high-magnification images (micrographs) contained in AGHCF file folders and experimental notebooks are in the form of polaroid photographs labeled with AGHCF identification number, magnification, and surface condition (as-polished or etched). Low magnification composite images (photomosaics) are also available for fuel cross sections, for radial strips from the fuel center to the cladding outer diameter, and for circumferential strips of the cladding and outer fuel region. The individual images do not have scale bars. Only a few of the composite images contain scale bars. The purpose of this work is to describe and apply methods for checking the magnification (50X to 500X) of individual images and for determining the magnification (~25X to ~100X) of composite images. The metallographic images used to verify and/or determine magnification were generated during the 1989 to 1993 timeframe for cross sections of U-10Zr/HT9 fuel rods irradiated in EBR-II and for cross sections of irradiated U-10Zr/HT9 fuel-rod samples following elevated-temperature tests conducted in the out-of-pile AGHCF Fuel Behavior Test Apparatus (FBTA). Procedures are documented in the AGHCF Operations Manual for preparation of metallographic samples, for calibration verification, and for constructing composites from individual images. Calibration verification of magnification was performed at least semiannually. One standard used for calibration verification was a glass slide with vertical lines indicating distances of 1 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.01mm. Guidance is provided in the current work for determining magnification from images of the standard. In addition to the periodic calibration verification, consistency checks are recommended to verify the magnification of images taken between the routine calibration verifications. For cladding samples with or without significant fuel-cladding chemical interaction (FCCI), images taken at different magnifications (e.g., 150X and 200X) of the unaffected cladding thickness can be compared. This process is independent of changes in cladding thickness due to swelling and creep. For images taken at only one magnification of cladding regions with no FCCI, the cladding thickness determined from the images may be compared to the nominal as-built cladding thickness (15.0 ± 0.5 mils for examples used in current work)). This procedure works best for cladding that has not experienced significant swelling and/or creep (e.g., ≤2% circumferential strain at the cladding outer surface). Composite images were constructed by pasting together higher magnification images and photographing the composite to generate a negative from which the hard-copy photograph was developed. The primary purpose of the composite images was to identify interesting areas of the fuel and cladding for imaging at higher magnification. However, procedures are recommended in the current work for determining composite magnifications to allow quantitative characterization of the fuel. Composites are not recommended for determining cladding thickness or FCCI depth because magnifications are too low (generally ≤110X) and image contrast is low. Fuel cross-section composites were created by pasting together 50X or 75X images. The nominal magnification for the photographed fuel cross-section composites is 25.4X. A more precise magnification can be determined by comparing the average cladding outer diameter measured from the composite to the average cladding outer diameter measured by profilometry. Radial-strip composites were constructed by pasting together high-magnification (150X or 250X) images. The nominal magnification of radial-strip composites photographs is about 100X. A more precise method for determining the magnification of radial strips is to compare the cladding thick