Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 22687977

Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process

Abstract

This paper explores how project developers and their consultants, government regulators and stakeholders can learn from the impact assessment (IA) process, thus potentially improving its effectiveness and enhancing project sustainability. Despite the benefits that learning can bring to an organization, failure to learn appears commonplace both within the IA process and, once approved, subsequent industrial development. To nurture organizational learning through IA, enabling structures that foster information sharing and interpretation and enhance organizational memory are needed. In this paper learning outcomes are grouped into three categories: acquisition of knowledge and skills, developing new behaviors and developing sustainability-oriented norms and values. Means to achieve such outcomes include education and training, experiential learning, learning through public participation (social learning) and a ‘learning organization approach’. Societal expectations increasingly demand not only projects that ‘pass’ the review criteria of regulators, financiers and the community, but IA processes capable of delivering sustainable outcomes that include learning and sharing of knowledge. It is proposed that learning be treated as a purposeful – not as an accidental – outcome of IA, and facilitated by adopting a ‘learning organization approach’ coupled with best practice such as early stakeholder engagement. - Highlights: • Proponents are challenged to develop projects that deliver sustainable outcomes. • Passing the test of government approval may be insufficient to obtain a social license. • Learning by all stakeholders is vital to meet these challenges. • Learning outcomes have to go beyond instrumental learning to reach new behaviors, norms and values. • A “learning organization approach” can promote mutual learning and improve project design.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mitchell, Ross. 2017-01-15. Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Water4Energy Step-1 Band-M Ready-to-Train Samples for TVA Weeks-to-Years Prediction, Version 0

AI-ready Band-M (monthly) labelled training pack for the Water4Energy Genesis Task-1 project on weeks-to-years prediction of Tennessee Valley temperature and precipitation. The deposit includes leakage-aware issue-time samples (samples_M_v0.nc; N=486), train-only scalers, issue-time split table, supporting monthly panels, and Python generation scripts to recreate the pack from the companion Tier-1 raw observation collection (https://doi.org/10.13139/ORNLNCCS/3398576). Each sample pairs a 12-month lookback of teleconnection indices and SST box anomalies with TVA-mean ERA5 anomaly targets (t2m, tp, msl) at leads 1–3 months.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, particle analysis

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, time bins

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗