Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 23042885

Image Analysis for Plug Bubbles in Horizontal Flow

Abstract

Horizontal plug flow is different from horizontal slug flow in that relatively few small bubbles exist in plug flow, whereas slug flow is characterized by highly aerated liquid slugs and liquid films. While the nose position and nose propagation velocity of plug bubbles may provide physical insights in understanding the flow regime transition mechanism between the plug and slug flows, few systematic investigations on these parameters have been performed in previous research. In view of this, this paper presents the development of an image processing method for the purpose of (a) obtaining data for nose position and nose propagation velocity of plug bubbles and (b) benchmarking local four-sensor conductivity probe measurements of time-averaged bubble velocity and void fraction. (authors)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rau, Adam, Kong, Ran, Kim, Seungjin, Bajorek, Stephen, Tien, Kirk, Hoxie, Chris. 2016-07-01. Image Analysis for Plug Bubbles in Horizontal Flow. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/23042885

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗