Search NASASearch

DOE OSTI · 2446631

Using Machine Learning to Predict Cloud Turbulent Entrainment–Mixing Processes

Abstract

Different turbulent entrainment–mixing mechanisms between clouds and environment are essential to cloud–related processes; however, accurate representation of entrainment–mixing in weather/climate models still poses a challenge. This study exploits the use of machine learning (ML) to address this challenge. Four ML (Light Gradient Boosting Machine [LGB], eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, and Support Vector Regression) are examined and compared. It is found that LGB performs best, and thus is selected to understand the impact of entrainment–mixing on microphysics using simulation data from Explicit Mixing Parcel Model. Compared with traditional parameterizations, the trained LGB provides more accurate microphysical properties (number concentration and cloud droplet spectral dispersion). The partial dependences of predicted microphysics on features exhibit a strong alignment with physical mechanisms and expectations, as determined by the interpreting method, thus overcoming the limitations of the “black box” scheme. The underlying mechanisms are that the smaller number concentration and larger spectral dispersion correspond to more inhomogeneous entrainment–mixing. Specifically, number concentration after entrainment–mixing is positively correlated with adiabatic number concentration and liquid water content affected by entrainment–mixing, and inversely correlated with adiabatic volume mean radius. Spectral dispersion after entrainment–mixing is negatively correlated with liquid water content affected by entrainment–mixing, turbulent dissipation rate and relative humidity of entrained air. Sensitivity analysis further suggests that number concentration is mainly determined by cloud microphysical properties whereas spectral dispersion is influenced by both cloud microphysical properties and environmental variables. The results indicate that the LGB scheme has the potential to enhance the representation of entrainment–mixing in weather/climate models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Gao, Sinan, Lu, Chunsong, Zhu, Jiashan, Li, Yabin, Liu, Yangang, Zhao, Binqi, Hu, Sheng, Liu, Xiantong, Lv, Jingjing. 2024-08-23. Using Machine Learning to Predict Cloud Turbulent Entrainment–Mixing Processes. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024ms004225

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Water4Energy Step-1 Band-M Ready-to-Train Samples for TVA Weeks-to-Years Prediction, Version 0

AI-ready Band-M (monthly) labelled training pack for the Water4Energy Genesis Task-1 project on weeks-to-years prediction of Tennessee Valley temperature and precipitation. The deposit includes leakage-aware issue-time samples (samples_M_v0.nc; N=486), train-only scalers, issue-time split table, supporting monthly panels, and Python generation scripts to recreate the pack from the companion Tier-1 raw observation collection (https://doi.org/10.13139/ORNLNCCS/3398576). Each sample pairs a 12-month lookback of teleconnection indices and SST box anomalies with TVA-mean ERA5 anomaly targets (t2m, tp, msl) at leads 1–3 months.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, particle analysis

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Multi-Angle Snowflake Camera, time bins

The c1 level data product for the Mutli-Angle Snowflake Camera contains snowflake fall speeds and particle size, among other analysis for images associated with each hydrometeor.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES