Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 2477383

Decarbonization Dilemmas: Deliberating Difficult Decisions in Laboratory Design

Romero, Rachel·Mangler, Jessica·DiMont, Suzy
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dive into the depths of design and decision-making, while we discuss the decarbonization of laboratory buildings! Delve into the dense domain of laboratory design and operations, where every development presents a diverse array of dilemmas and delights. Join us for these dynamic sessions focused on decoding the secrets of sustainable success. Dig deep into the dynamic world of heat pump designs and the delicate balance of heating and cooling loads. Debate between constant and variable fume hood designs, where these decisions determine outcomes. Discover the divergent paths of HVAC system implementation, from the deployment of chilled beams to the diverse array of different terminal unit types. But don't delay; decisive action is demanded for these goals! Dare to dream of decarbonization as we direct discussions on retrofitting existing building stock versus innovative new design approaches. Delve into the depths of debate and emerge with a decisive strategy for sustainable success. Discuss recent discoveries in development from experts associated with existing laboratory buildings with decarbonization goals. These insights and lessons learned will help determine the path forward in our industry's drive for decarbonization designs. Decarbonization is no easy task, but with determination, dedication, and devotion, we can defy the odds and forge a brighter future for laboratory design and operations. Let's dare to decarbonize together!

Explore related subjects

decarbonizationefficiencyENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATIONI2SLlaboratorySmart Labssustainability

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Romero, Rachel, Mangler, Jessica, DiMont, Suzy. 2024-11-08. Decarbonization Dilemmas: Deliberating Difficult Decisions in Laboratory Design. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/2477383

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2025

Simulating regional workforce impacts of decarbonizing integrated steelmaking

Global efforts to mitigate climate change are increasing pressure on heavy manufacturing industries to decarbonize production. The iron and steel industry is responsible for 7% of CO 2 emissions globally (2% in the United States) and is often a major employer in the regions where iron and steel is produced. Understanding the future prospects for workers in regions with high CO 2 emitting industries—including impacts of phasing out or evolving such industries—will be critical for informing regional economic and clean energy strategies. We simulate the impact of an “in-place” transition that replaces today’s integrated production with direct reduced iron (DRI) used in electric arc furnaces (EAFs), using Southwest Pennsylvania as an application of our generalizable approach. Our results suggest that the integrated steelmaking workforce today has the skills, knowledge, and abilities (SKAs) to fill over 95% of all jobs required by DRI/EAF facilities, but the number of jobs is only 25% of those at integrated plants. We also find that some occupational groups have greater general transferability into the broader job market, while other groups, such as production workers, are ill-equipped today based on current SKAs to transition out of the iron and steel industry. Our methodology further suggests factors that limit transitions: Around 85% of occupations are more limited by missing skills, while 15% are more limited by insufficient wages. These results may help to improve the design of social policy and the targeting of retraining programs, while the simulation approach can be readily adapted for other regions and industries.

decarbonization↗
DOE OSTI2025

Grid Value Analysis of Geothermal Systems for End-Use Applications

Fuel based end-uses for residential, commercial, and industrial consumers require a technology change to achieve economy-wide decarbonization. Space heating accounts for 42% of residential and 32% of commercial energy demand, much of which is currently met through carbon emitting fuels. Industrial energy use is heavily fuel based with electricity currently representing 13% of energy demand. Geothermal heat pumps (GHPs) and geothermal direct use can eliminate the need for CO2 emitting and simultaneously allow for more efficient electrification of end uses. Past work has assessed the impact on total energy costs and generation investments but did not identify specific grid services benefited. Energy usage in residential and commercial structures was assessed by leveraging data from ComStock and ResStock models. These models utilize housing attributes, occupancy patterns, weather data, and sophisticated energy simulations to generate hourly load profiles for individual buildings identified by unique IDs associated with their locations. Industrial sector energy use was evaluated using information from the Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS) as well as plant utilization data from the US Census to estimate hourly plant operations. The change in end-use demand for electricity, natural gas, and other fuels was calculated for different technologies that could meet this need. Using the ReEDS capacity expansion model, we produce regional price profiles that capture the grid benefit associated with the amount and timing of energy shifts in the power system from the adoption of geothermal systems relative to other technologies that could meet space heating, space cooling, and process heat requirements. We find that geothermal systems for meeting end-use demand add value to the energy system. In buildings where geothermal systems increase grid costs, these values are offset by reduced fuel costs and benefits to externalities, including emissions and health impacts.

decarbonization↗
DOE OSTI2024

Comparison of Silicon Decarbonization Methods to Reduce Process Emissions and Energy Consumption

The demand for silicon is rising due to its use in solar cells, electronics, and alloying as part of the green transition. However, these products require silicon metal (metallurgical grade silicon, >98% Si) as their main raw material before undergoing further chemical refining, usually via gas phase in methods such as the Siemens process. Silicon metal is currently produced in a submerged arc furnace via carbothermic reduction of quartz, which results in 10-12 tCO2/tSi. More than 40% of these emissions are process emissions, meaning they do not include contributions from electricity generation or transport. This talk will discuss promising methods to reduce or eliminate these process emissions. These include the use of biocarbon and carbon capture, aluminothermic reduction, electrochemical reduction with molten salts, and use of hydrogen in a modified Siemens process. Biocarbon and carbon capture is a straightforward method to reduce the net carbon emissions of the process, but long-term sustainable production of high-quality charcoal is a challenge. Aluminothermic reduction makes good use of aluminum byproducts such as dross but is perhaps limited in its applications to aluminum-silicon alloy products. Electrochemical reduction is promising as a method of producing high purity Si from quartz, without further need for the Siemens process, but is still in early stages of research and slow processing times are a concern. Finally, the use of hydrogen in a modified Siemens process would also result in a high purity Si product from quartz, however the process has considerable logistical challenges with corrosive and unstable gases at high temperatures. This talk will further expand on the potential merits and challenges of each method, while comparing their potential to reduce emissions and/or energy consumption while meeting global demand.

decarbonization↗