Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 2540213

Standardization and Recommendations for EVSE Cybersecurity Standards

Cryar, Ryan [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)]·Hatic, Dana [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)]·Jun, Myungsoo [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)]·Lamb, Christopher [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)]·Mitchell, Sherry Lee [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)]·Moiseyenko, Yulia [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)]·Sanghvi, Anuj [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)]·Tsikteris, Sean [Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (United States); Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ (United States)]·Tsiropoulou, Eirini Eleni [Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (United States); Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ (United States)]·Varriale, Roland [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)]
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Currently, there is an absence of cybersecurity certification programs specifically for EVSE. Many existing standards focus primarily on safety, such as battery safety, while others provide cybersecu rity guidelines for different types of equipment, which could be adapted for EVSE. Among these, ISA/IEC 62443 has been identified as highly aligned with EVSE security needs. This report is a follow on to the previous research published (“Assessment and Coordination of EVSE Cybersecurity Standards,”). This report aims to find appropriate strategies for closing the gaps found in the aforementioned report and continue to work towards a comprehensive cybersecurity certification program for EVSE. Future testing will leverage this standard to assess EVSE security gaps and strengths, providing valuable insights to support certification development and harmonization of cybersecurity standards.

Explore related subjects

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEFENSE97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cryar, Ryan [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)], Hatic, Dana [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)], Jun, Myungsoo [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)], Lamb, Christopher [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)], Mitchell, Sherry Lee [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)], Moiseyenko, Yulia [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)], Sanghvi, Anuj [National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)], Tsikteris, Sean [Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (United States); Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ (United States)], Tsiropoulou, Eirini Eleni [Univ. of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (United States); Arizona State Univ., Tempe, AZ (United States)], Varriale, Roland [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)]. 2025-02-01. Standardization and Recommendations for EVSE Cybersecurity Standards. https://doi.org/10.2172/2540213

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Morgana Overview – NCERC Support for Dynamic Subcritical Experiments

The LANL Subcritical Experiments Program (SCE) recently executed the Morgana Subcritical Experiment at the NNSS. This was the first subcritical experiment executed by LANL for several years (since 2021). It was also notably the first that required SCE personnel to have FMH qualifications for a portion of the work conducted under nuclear criticality safety limits.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2026

AWSD Reactive Burn Model for the HMX‐Based High Explosive LX‐04

An Arrhenius–Wescott–Stewart–Davis (AWSD) reactive burn model is applied to describe shock initiation and detonation properties of the HMX-based high explosive LX-04. The parameters in the model are calibrated to data from multiple sources. The thermodynamic equations of state used in the model are calibrated to a combination of thermochemical calculations for HMX and LX-04 as well as experimentally-measured cylinder expansion results for LX-04. The kinetic parameters are calibrated to velocity data from gas gun experiments performed using EDC-32—a high explosive with the same chemical composition as LX-04 but different structural properties, and scaled rate stick data for PBX 9012. The AWSD model is shown to accurately describe the shock initiation and propagation of LX-04. Very good agreement is observed between the available experimental data and the AWSD model output. The presented results constitute an accurate LX-04 reactive burn model for use in engineering-scale models and simulations.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗
DOE OSTI2026

Surface and Buried Thermal, and RGB Unexploded Ordnance Data Collection

This document provides a description of a data collection campaign of unexploded ordnance (UXOI) set. The dataset captures a controlled UAV imaging campaign designed to support detection of UXO across varied environmental conditions. Data were collected during three campaigns in Norris and Northeast Knoxville, Tennessee, using RGB, and thermal sensors mounted on Parrot UKR. In total, the dataset contains 9925 images, 26 full-motion video, and approximately 81.99 GB of data, collected across late spring/summer conditions, every hour during sunlight, and multiple surface contexts, including tall grass, short grass, gravel, as well as buried in sand, and other gravel mixtures. The collection was designed to capture thermal and visual variability relevant to UXO detection in agricultural land, bare earth, and subsurface. Review of the imagery showed that ordnance was most detectable during periods of changing solar input, especially approximately 10-60 minutes after sunrise, approximately 20-60 minutes after sunset, and 2-3 min after cloud cover interrupted prolonged solar heating. These conditions increased thermal contrast because many ordnance items retained or released heat differently than the surrounding vegetation and ground surface. This dataset provides a useful resource for developing and evaluating airborne UXO detection methods under realistic field conditions. All ordnance used in the study was inert, and thermal behavior may differ from that of live ordnance. In addition, variation in ordnance type, composition, and placement introduced differences in thermal response that should be considered when interpreting results.

45 MILITARY TECHNOLOGY, WEAPONRY, AND NATIONAL DEF↗