Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 2581070

Structural transitions enable interleukin-18 maturation and signaling

Abstract

Not provided.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dong, Ying, Bonin, Jeffrey, Devant, Pascal, Liang, Zhuoyi, Sever, Alexander, Mintseris, Julian, Aramini, James, Du, Gang, Gygi, Stephen, Kagan, Jonathan, Kay, Lewis, Wu, Hao. 2024-07-01. Structural transitions enable interleukin-18 maturation and signaling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2024.04.015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Physicochemical and biological characterization of a bispecific antibody in a CrossMab/KIH format that targets EGFR and VEGF-A

Introduction Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are a class of antibody therapeutics engineered in various molecular formats to bind two distinct antigens and potentially mediate multiple biological effects. These molecular formats are tailored to mediate specific mechanisms of action and possess unique physicochemical and biological properties that are necessary to assure product quality. In ovarian cancer (OC), both EGFR- and VEGF-A-mediated signaling pathways are often upregulated and cooperate to promote tumor growth and angiogenesis. Thus, inhibiting of EGFR- and VEGF-A pathways with a BsAb may provide synergistic anti-tumor activity. Methods Using publicly available sequences and applying immunoglobulin domain crossover (CrossMab) and knobs-into-holes (KIH) technologies, we generated a BsAb to simultaneously bind EGFR and VEGF-A (designated as anti-EGFR/VEGF-A BsAb). This BsAb served as a model for physiochemical and biological characterization of quality attributes that would be critical for the BsAb’s mechanisms of action. Our goal was to gain fundamental insights into BsAbs designed to target a receptor with one arm and a soluble ligand with the other, to support bioassay development and inform quality control strategies. Results Our data demonstrated that the CrossMab/KIH platform successfully produced a correctly assembled BsAb during cell culture. Characterization confirmed that the anti-EGFR/VEGF-A BsAb bound both EGFR and VEGF-A with comparable activity and affinity to the respective parental monoclonal antibodies. Functionally, the BsAb disrupted both EGF/EGFR and VEGF-A/VEGFR2 signaling pathways in OC and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) models. Furthermore, the BsAb effectively blocked angiogenic signaling driven by VEGF-A secreted from OC cells in a paracrine manner. Discussion Based on the combinatorial mechanism of action and our characterization findings, we concluded that two or more bioassays may be needed to accurately assess the activity of both arms of this type of BsAb.

Immunology↗

A combined designed CSP and Pfs48/45 infection and transmission blocking vaccine for malaria

Abstract The multiple stages of the malaria parasite life cycle hampers vaccine development. Combining a pre-erythrocytic antigen with a transmission-blocking antigen would target two independent stages of the life cycle for disease control, resulting in a multistage vaccine that can prevent infection and disease transmission simultaneously. Here, we generated a self-assembled ferritin nanoparticle vaccine that simultaneously presents designed immunogens CSPj5c and 17-4 from the infection-blocking circumsporozoite and the transmission-blocking Pfs48/45 antigens. These immunogens were designed, through structure-based approaches, to retain protective epitopes and confer protection upon vaccination. Immunization with CSPj5c-17-4-ferritin nanoparticles conferred protection against challenge with transgenic sporozoites expressingPlasmodium falciparumCSP in mice, and purified IgGs from immunized rabbits elicited potent transmission-reducing activity. Addition of the engineered 17-4 improved the immune responses to CSPj5c and protection from sporozoite challenge. CSPj5c-17-4-ferritin is therefore a promising multistage malaria vaccine with a potential role in malaria control.

Immunology↗

Evaluation of Cross-Protection of African Swine Fever Vaccine ASFV-G-ΔI177L Between ASFV Biotypes

Background/Objectives: Vaccine development for the prevention of ASF has been very challenging due to the extensive genetic and largely unknown antigenic diversity. Inactivated vaccines, using different inactivation methods and a variety of adjuvants, have been consistently inefficacious. Historically, animals recovering from an infection with an attenuated virus became protected from the development of a clinical disease caused by an antigenically related strain. Therefore, immunization of susceptible animals with attenuathe ted virus strains has become a common method of vaccination with the first two commercially available vaccines based on recombinant live-attenuated viruses (LAVs). An important limitation is that the efficacy of the LAV is restricted to those strains that are antigenically related and, in most cases, only provide protection against homologous strains. Due to the unknown antigenic heterogeneity among all ASFV field isolates, the development of broad-spectrum vaccines is a challenge. Besides the anecdotal data, there is not a large amount of information describing patterns of cross-protection between different ASFV strains. Methods: We evaluated the cross-protection induced by the ASFV live-attenuated vaccine ASFV-G-ΔI177L against different biotypes of ASFV and compared their genomic sequences to determine potential genetic mutations that could cause the lack of cross-protection. Results: Results presented here demonstrate different patterns of protection when ASFV-G-ΔI177L vaccinated pigs were challenged with six different ASFV field isolates belonging to different biotypes. Conclusions: The presence of cross-protection cannot be predicted solely by the classical methodology for genotyping-based B646L ORF only. Biotyping, considering the entire virus proteome, appears to be a more promising prediction tool, although additional gathering of experimental data will be necessary to fully validate it; until then, the presence of cross-protection needs to be confirmed in efficacy trials challenging vaccinated animals.

Immunology↗