Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 2584747

NIF Enhanced Yield Capability Conceptual Design Review Report

Divoky, Pamela [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Horner, Jeff [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Kruschwitz, Brian [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Westphal, Derek [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Mangan, Mike [Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Savage, Mark [Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)]·rigatti, Amy [Univ. of Rochester, NY (United States)]·Paik, Sam [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Primdahl, Keith [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Kohut, Tom [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Wegner, Paul [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory]·Ang, Desiree [US Department of Energy (USDOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Washington, DC (United States)]·Dang, Phuoc [US Department of Energy (USDOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Washington, DC (United States)]·Mason, Dan [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]·Larson, Doug [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of the NIF Enhanced Yield Capability (EYC) Conceptual Design Review was to evaluate key aspects of the design and assess readiness to move to the next phase of the project. The NNSA accepted the NIF Integrated Product Review Board (IPRB) process as an appropriate means of conducting the review. The review committee finds that the NIF EYC Design Team has successfully addressed the review scope objectives. No Type 1 action items or liens were identified during the technical review. Some recommendations and observations are recorded below to assist the team.

Explore related subjects

42 ENGINEERING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Divoky, Pamela [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Horner, Jeff [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Kruschwitz, Brian [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Westphal, Derek [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Mangan, Mike [Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)], Savage, Mark [Sandia National Lab. (SNL-CA), Livermore, CA (United States)], rigatti, Amy [Univ. of Rochester, NY (United States)], Paik, Sam [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Primdahl, Keith [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Kohut, Tom [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Wegner, Paul [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory], Ang, Desiree [US Department of Energy (USDOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Washington, DC (United States)], Dang, Phuoc [US Department of Energy (USDOE) National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Washington, DC (United States)], Mason, Dan [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)], Larson, Doug [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)]. 2025-08-25. NIF Enhanced Yield Capability Conceptual Design Review Report. https://doi.org/10.2172/2584747

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗