Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 2585572

Impact Testing Theories and Techniques Employed at the TA-III Mechanical Shock Complex

Slavin, Adam Michael [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)]
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present theories and techniques to support safe, predictable, and efficient impact testing at the Sandia National Laboratories TA-III Mechanical Shock Complex (MSC), located in Building 6570. The two testing instruments used at the MSC are the 20-inch actuator, which is a launcher that propels sleds down an indoor track, and an indoor 6-in bore compressed-gas powered cannon. The theories and techniques presented derive from basic mechanical engineering principles but are significantly informed and validated by testing experience at the MSC.

Explore related subjects

42 ENGINEERING

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Slavin, Adam Michael [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)]. 2025-05-01. Impact Testing Theories and Techniques Employed at the TA-III Mechanical Shock Complex. https://doi.org/10.2172/2585572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗