Search NASAβŒ• Search

DOE OSTI Β· 2997496

Layered patterns of active scalar fields in a two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic system

Abstract

Here, we observe the formation of staircase patterns in the magnetic potential (𝐴) in a weakly magnetized two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic system driven by a forced, fluctuating vortex array. Layering occurs due to inhomogeneous mixing of 𝐴 by vortex cells. Magnetic Reynolds number (𝑅 π‘š )–dependent quenching of the turbulent diffusion of 𝐴 by weak magnetic fields increases the disparity between the (short) cell circulation time and the (long) time for intercell transport of magnetic potential. Thus, magnetic fields strengthen transport barriers between cells and reinforce the staircase, relative to its passive scalar counterpart. The analysis reveals a feedback mechanism, which promotes staircase formation. Magnetic staircases persist in both the flux expulsion (𝑅 π‘š ⁒𝑣$^2_𝐴$/π‘ˆ$^2_0$<1) and vortex disruption (𝑅 π‘š ⁒𝑣$^2_𝐴$/π‘ˆ$^2_0$β‰₯1) limits. In the latter case, residual vortex cells homogenize 𝐴. Global layering morphology is shown to be well characterized by staircase curvature. Stochastic forcing of magnetic potential can support magnetic staircases against resistive decay.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ramirez, F. R. [Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0009000169943192), Diamond, P. H. [Univ. of California, San Diego, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000332732604). 2025-05-21. Layered patterns of active scalar fields in a two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic system. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.111.055107

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Comparing Magnetopause Predictions From Two MHD Models During A Geomagnetic Storm and A Quiet Period

Magnetopause location is an important prediction of numerical simulations of the magnetosphere, yet the models can err, either under-predicting or over-predicting the motion of the boundary. This study compares results from two of the most widely used magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) models, the Lyon–Fedder–Mobarry (LFM) model and the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF), to data from the GOES 13 and 15 satellites during the geomagnetic storm on 22 June 2015, and to THEMIS A, D, and E during a quiet period on 31 January 2013. The models not only reproduce the magnetopause crossings of the spacecraft during the storm, but they also predict spurious magnetopause motion after the crossings seen in the GOES data. We investigate the possible causes of the over-predictions during the storm and find the following. First, using different ionospheric conductance models does not significantly alter predictions of the magnetopause location. Second, coupling the Rice Convection Model (RCM) to the MHD codes improves the SWMF magnetopause predictions more than it does for the LFM predictions. Third, the SWMF produces a stronger ring current than LFM, both with and without the RCM and regardless of the LFM spatial resolution. During the non-storm event, LFM predicts the THEMIS magnetopause crossings due to the southward interplanetary magnetic field better than the SWMF. Additionally, increasing the LFM spatial grid resolution improves the THEMIS predictions, while increasing the SWMF grid resolutions does not.

magnetohydrodynamics↗