Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 3000024

The new ITER baseline, research plan and open R&D issues

Loarte, A. [ITER Organization, St. Paul Lez Durance (France); et al.] (ORCID:0000000195921117)·Pitts, R A (ORCID:0000000194552698)·Wauters, T (ORCID:0000000229417817)·Nunes, I·de Vries, P (ORCID:0000000173045486)·Kim, S H·Köchl, F·Polevoi, A·Lehnen, M (ORCID:0000000160438803)·Artola, J·Jachmich, S·Pshenov, A·Bai, X (ORCID:0000000209119935)·Carvalho, I S (ORCID:0000000224588377)·Dubrov, M·Gribov, Y·Schneider, M (ORCID:0000000348816861)·Zabeo, L·Bonnin, X·Pinches, S D (ORCID:000000030132945X)·Poli, F (ORCID:0000000339594371)·Lopez, G Suarez (ORCID:0000000190090027)·Merola, M·Escourbiac, F·Hunt, R·Chen, L (ORCID:0000000342335936)·Boilson, D·Veltri, P (ORCID:0000000206251201)·Casal, N·Preynas, M·Mukherjee, A·Helou, W·Kazarian, F·Willms, S·Bonnet, I·Michling, R (ORCID:0009000826661516)·Giancarli, L·van der Laan, J·Walsh, M·Udintsev, V·Reichle, R·Vayakis, G·Fossen, A (ORCID:0009000711397284)·Turnyanskiy, M·Becoulet, A (ORCID:0000000269189249)·Kamada, Y·Zhuang, G (ORCID:0000000260488568)·Xu, G (ORCID:0000000184958678)·Gong, X·Huang, J (ORCID:000000015662809X)·Jia, M (ORCID:0000000216729782)·Ding, R (ORCID:0000000328809736)·Qian, J·Sun, Y (ORCID:0000000299341328)·Yang, Q (ORCID:0000000263541408)·Zhang, L·Xu, M (ORCID:0009000130597026)·Brezinsek, S (ORCID:0000000272133326)·Stober, J (ORCID:0000000251509224)·Hobirk, J (ORCID:0000000166050068)·Rimini, F (ORCID:0009000129170455)·Garcia, J (ORCID:0000000309005564)·Rao, S L·Ghosh, J (ORCID:0000000243691900)·Sharma, D·Magesh, B (ORCID:0009000369535580)·Bhattacharya, R P·Matsunaga, G·Urano, H (ORCID:0000000187408954)·Hirose, T·Ogawa, K (ORCID:0000000345551837)·Motojima, G (ORCID:0000000155223082)·Sung, C K (ORCID:0000000281220018)·Lee, H H·Park, J K·Cheon, M S·Jeon, Y M (ORCID:0000000273743759)·Konovalov, S·Lebedev, S (ORCID:0000000159795344)·Kirneva, N·Kashchuk, Y·Bakharev, N (ORCID:0000000281474739)·Chen, X (ORCID:0000000287186877)·Bortolon, A·Casali, L (ORCID:0000000329243674)·Maingi, R (ORCID:0000000312388121)·Turco, F (ORCID:0000000237230438)·Schmid, K·Liu, Y (ORCID:0000000281928411)·Martín-Solís, J R (ORCID:0000000304584405)·Angioni, C (ORCID:0000000302709630)·Pusztai, I (ORCID:0000000154124090)·Fajardo, D (ORCID:0000000158024572)·Mateev, D (ORCID:0000000161298427)·Lerche, E (ORCID:0000000345843581)·van Eester, D (ORCID:0000000242843992)·Vincenzi, P (ORCID:0000000251564354)·Futtersack, R·Bobkov, V·Colas, L

Abstract

A new baseline (NB) has been proposed by the ITER Project to ensure a robust achievement of the Projects’ goals, in view of past challenges including delays incurred due to the Covid-19 pandemic, technical challenges in completing first-of-a-kind components and in nuclear licensing. The NB includes modifications to the configuration of the ITER device and its ancillaries (e.g. change from beryllium to tungsten as first wall material, modification of the heating and current drive mix, etc.) as well as additional testing of components (e.g. toroidal field coils) or phased installation (start with inertially cooled first wall before later installation of the final actively water-cooled components) to minimise operational risks. In the NB, the ITER research plan (IRP) will be divided into three main phases: (a) start of research operation, with 40 MW of ECH and 10 MW of ICH, which will focus on the demonstration of 15 MA operation in L-mode, commissioning of all required systems, including disruption mitigation, and the demonstration of H-mode plasma operation in deuterium; (b) DT-1, with 60–67 MW of ECH, 33 MW of neutral beam injection (NBI) and 10–20 MW of ICH, which will demonstrate robust operation in high confinement H-mode plasmas in DT up to Q ⩾ 10 and for burn durations of 300–500 s within an accumulated neutron fluence of ∼1% of the ITER machine’s lifetime total, and; (c) DT-2, with up to 67 MW of ECH, up to 49.5 MW of NBI and up to 20 MW of ICH, with the ITER tokamak and ancillaries in their final configuration to demonstrate routine operation in DT plasmas at high Q and the Q ⩾ 5 long-pulse and steady-state scenarios to the final neutron fluence and to perform R&D on nuclear fusion reactor issues. The logic, physics basis, modelling and experimental evaluations carried out to support the NB and the associated IRP are described. These include the impact of the tungsten wall on plasma scenarios and associated risk mitigation measures, as well as the optimisation of the tokamak components and ancillaries to minimise Project risks. Open R&D issues related to these evaluations and mitigation measures are also described together with experimental, modelling and validation activities required to address them.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Loarte, A. [ITER Organization, St. Paul Lez Durance (France); et al.] (ORCID:0000000195921117), Pitts, R A (ORCID:0000000194552698), Wauters, T (ORCID:0000000229417817), Nunes, I, de Vries, P (ORCID:0000000173045486), Kim, S H, Köchl, F, Polevoi, A, Lehnen, M (ORCID:0000000160438803), Artola, J, Jachmich, S, Pshenov, A, Bai, X (ORCID:0000000209119935), Carvalho, I S (ORCID:0000000224588377), Dubrov, M, Gribov, Y, Schneider, M (ORCID:0000000348816861), Zabeo, L, Bonnin, X, Pinches, S D (ORCID:000000030132945X), Poli, F (ORCID:0000000339594371), Lopez, G Suarez (ORCID:0000000190090027), Merola, M, Escourbiac, F, Hunt, R, Chen, L (ORCID:0000000342335936), Boilson, D, Veltri, P (ORCID:0000000206251201), Casal, N, Preynas, M, Mukherjee, A, Helou, W, Kazarian, F, Willms, S, Bonnet, I, Michling, R (ORCID:0009000826661516), Giancarli, L, van der Laan, J, Walsh, M, Udintsev, V, Reichle, R, Vayakis, G, Fossen, A (ORCID:0009000711397284), Turnyanskiy, M, Becoulet, A (ORCID:0000000269189249), Kamada, Y, Zhuang, G (ORCID:0000000260488568), Xu, G (ORCID:0000000184958678), Gong, X, Huang, J (ORCID:000000015662809X), Jia, M (ORCID:0000000216729782), Ding, R (ORCID:0000000328809736), Qian, J, Sun, Y (ORCID:0000000299341328), Yang, Q (ORCID:0000000263541408), Zhang, L, Xu, M (ORCID:0009000130597026), Brezinsek, S (ORCID:0000000272133326), Stober, J (ORCID:0000000251509224), Hobirk, J (ORCID:0000000166050068), Rimini, F (ORCID:0009000129170455), Garcia, J (ORCID:0000000309005564), Rao, S L, Ghosh, J (ORCID:0000000243691900), Sharma, D, Magesh, B (ORCID:0009000369535580), Bhattacharya, R P, Matsunaga, G, Urano, H (ORCID:0000000187408954), Hirose, T, Ogawa, K (ORCID:0000000345551837), Motojima, G (ORCID:0000000155223082), Sung, C K (ORCID:0000000281220018), Lee, H H, Park, J K, Cheon, M S, Jeon, Y M (ORCID:0000000273743759), Konovalov, S, Lebedev, S (ORCID:0000000159795344), Kirneva, N, Kashchuk, Y, Bakharev, N (ORCID:0000000281474739), Chen, X (ORCID:0000000287186877), Bortolon, A, Casali, L (ORCID:0000000329243674), Maingi, R (ORCID:0000000312388121), Turco, F (ORCID:0000000237230438), Schmid, K, Liu, Y (ORCID:0000000281928411), Martín-Solís, J R (ORCID:0000000304584405), Angioni, C (ORCID:0000000302709630), Pusztai, I (ORCID:0000000154124090), Fajardo, D (ORCID:0000000158024572), Mateev, D (ORCID:0000000161298427), Lerche, E (ORCID:0000000345843581), van Eester, D (ORCID:0000000242843992), Vincenzi, P (ORCID:0000000251564354), Futtersack, R, Bobkov, V, Colas, L. 2025-06-05. The new ITER baseline, research plan and open R&D issues. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587%2Fadd9c9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Drift-kinetic effects of tungsten on plasma response to RMP in ITER

Here, effects of high- Z ( Z is the particle charge number) tungsten impurity ions on the plasma response to the resonant magnetic perturbation (RMP) field are numerically investigated for the ITER 15 MA baseline scenario, where the tungsten contribution to the plasma response is computed with a drift-kinetic model while the bulk thermal particle contributions follow the fluid approximation. The study yields three highlights: (i) the drift-kinetic contribution of the tungsten impurity exerts minor influence on the plasma response compared to that computed by the pure fluid model without tungsten; (ii) a new figure of merit, based on the resonant spectrum perturbation at the plasma boundary surface, results in different optimal coil phasing compared to that previously obtained by maximizing the edge-peeling plasma response; (iii) the optimal $n = 3$ RMP (for edge localized mode (ELM) control, $n$ is the toroidal mode number) is found to induce a large tungsten particle influx near the plasma edge associated with the neoclassical toroidal viscosity. The study thus provides useful data on the compatibility of the full tungsten wall with RMP ELM control in ITER.

ITER↗

Modelling the limiter ramp-up of WEST for addressing the future challenges of ITER

This paper presents a joint experimental and numerical investigation into the physics of long limited plasma ramp-up in tokamaks with tungsten (W) first walls, a critical phase for ITER operation. The comparison between the average plasma quantities simulated using the SolEdge-HDG code and the measurements taken during three successive WEST discharges after boronisation shows how challenging it is to predict this phase. While simulations reproduce the general trends at the midplane, with reasonable match in density profiles, they consistently underestimate core temperatures possibly due to too large perpendicular heat conductivity. On the contrary, at the high field side (HFS) limiter, simulations overestimate the measured quantities, and highlights the limitation of using Bohm boundary conditions at grazing magnetic angles. Experimental measurements reveal that the boron layer is rapidly eroded, on a timescale comparable to a single ITER discharge. The subsequent transition from a boron-coated to a tungsten wall increases recycling and significantly degrades the core plasma, reducing the electron temperature by nearly half due to W contamination, despite wall parameters remaining stable. Furthermore, comparisons with Langmuir probes, bolometry, reflectometry, and spectroscopy indicate that the experimental far scrape-Off layer (SOL) is significantly wider than simulated. This wide SOL implies that boron erosion extends along the entire HFS limiter rather than being confined to the contact point. This work highlights some characteristics of the plasma during this phase of the discharge and emphasizes the current modelling issues that need to be resolved in order to obtain reliable predictions concerning the ITER ramp-up.

ITER↗

Predicting core transport in ITER baseline discharges with neon injections

Achieving self-consistent performance predictions for ITER requires integrated modeling of core transport and divertor power exhaust under realistic impurity conditions. We present results from a systematic power-flow and impurity-content study for the ITER 15 MA baseline scenario constrained directly by existing SOLPS-ITER neon-seeded divertor solutions. Using the OMFIT STEP workflow, stationary temperature and density profiles are predicted with TGYRO for $1.5 \unicode{x2A7D} Z_\textrm{eff} \unicode{x2A7D} 2.5$, and the corresponding power crossing the separatrix $P_\textrm{sep}$ is evaluated. We find that $P_\textrm{sep}$ varies by more than a factor of 1.7 across this scan and matches the ${\sim}100$ MW SOLPS-ITER prediction when $Z_\textrm{eff} \simeq 1.6$ or when auxiliary heating is reduced to ${\sim}75\%$ of nominal. Rotation-sensitivity studies show that plausible variations in toroidal flow magnitude modify $P_\textrm{sep}$ by $\lesssim 20\%$, while AURORA modeling confirms that charge-exchange radiation inside the separatrix is dynamically negligible under predicted ITER neutral densities. These results identify a restricted compatibility window, $Z_\textrm{eff} \approx 1.6$ –1.75 and $0.75 \lesssim f_{P_\textrm{aux}} \unicode{x2A7D} 1.0$, in which core transport predictions remain aligned with neon-seeded divertor protection targets. This self-consistent, model-constrained framework provides actionable guidance for impurity control and auxiliary-heating scheduling in early ITER operation and supports future whole-device scenario optimization.

ITER↗