Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 3008691

Testing gravitational physics by combining DESI DR1 and weak lensing datasets using the E_G estimator

Rauhut, S. J. [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)]·Blake, Chris [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)]·Andrade, U. [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)]·Noriega, H. E. [Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City (Mexico)]·Aguilar, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Ahlen, S. [Boston Univ., MA (United States)]·BenZvi, S. [Univ. of Rochester, NY (United States)]·Bianchi, D. [Univ. degli Studi di Milano (Italy); Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Milano (Italy). Osservatorio Astrofisico di Brera]·Brooks, D. [Univ. College London (United Kingdom)]·Claybaugh, T. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Cuceu, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·de la Macorra, A. [Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City (Mexico)]·DeRose, J. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·Doel, P. [Univ. College London (United Kingdom)]·Emas, N. [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)]·Ferraro, S. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Forero-Romero, J. E. [Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá (Colombia)]·Garcia-Quintero, C. [Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)]·Gaztañaga, E. [Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Castelldefels (Spain); Univ. of Portsmouth (United Kingdom); Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Barcelona (Spain). Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC)]·Gutierrez, G. [Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)]·Heydenreich, S. [Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)]·Honscheid, K. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)]·Howlett, C. [Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD (Australia)]·Huterer, D. [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)]·Ishak, M. [Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX (United States)]·Joudaki, S. [Research Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain)]·Joyce, R. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)]·Jullo, E. [Aix-Marseille Univ., Marseille (France)]·Kehoe, R. [Southern Methodist Univ., Dallas, TX (United States)]·Kirkby, D. [Univ. of California, Irvine, CA (United States)]·Kremin, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Krolewski, A. [Univ. of Waterloo, ON (Canada)]·Lahav, O. [Univ. College London (United Kingdom)]·Lambert, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Lamman, C. [Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)]·Landriau, M. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Lange, J. U. [American University, Washington, DC (United States)]·Le Guillou, L. [Sorbonne Univ., Paris (France)]·Leauthaud, A. [Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)]·Manera, M. [Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Spain); Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST) (Spain)]·Meisner, A. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)]·Miquel, R. [Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST) (Spain); Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona (Spain)]·Nadathur, S. [Univ. of Portsmouth (United Kingdom)]·Newman, J. A. [Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States). Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC)]·Niz, G. [Universidad de Guanajuato (Mexico); Instituto Avanzado de Cosmología A. C., Mexico City (Mexico)]·Palanque-Delabrouille, N. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette (France)]·Percival, W. J. [Univ. of Waterloo, ON (Canada)]·Porredon, A. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States); Research Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain); Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland (United Kingdom); Ruhr Univ., Bochum (Germany)]·Prada, F. [Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Granada (Spain)]·Pérez-Ràfols, I. [Univ. Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona (Spain)]·Rossi, G. [Sejong Univ., Seoul (Korea, Republic of)]·Ruggeri, R. [Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD (Australia)]·Sanchez, E. [Research Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain)]·Saulder, C. [Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching (Germany)]·Schlegel, D. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Semenaite, A. [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)]·Silber, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Sprayberry, D. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)]·Sun, Z. [Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)]·Tarlé, G. [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)]·Weaver, B. A. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)]·Zarrouk, P. [Sorbonne Univ., Paris (France)]·Zhou, R. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)]·Zou, H. [Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China). National Astronomical Observatories]

Abstract

The action of gravitational physics across space-time creates observable signatures in the behaviour of light and matter. We perform combined-probe studies using data from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument survey Data Release 1 (DESI-DR1), in combination with three existing weak lensing surveys, the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and the Hyper Suprime-Cam Survey (HSC), to test and constrain General Relativity (GR) in the context of the standard model of cosmology (LCDM). We focus on measuring the gravitational estimator statistic, E_G, which describes the relative amplitudes of weak gravitational lensing and galaxy velocities induced by a common set of overdensities. By comparing our amplitude measurements with their predicted scale- and redshift-dependence within the GR+LCDM model, we demonstrate that our results are consistent with the predictions of the Planck cosmology. The redshift span of the DESI dataset allows us to perform these E_G measurements at the highest redshifts achieved to date, z ~ 1.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rauhut, S. J. [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)], Blake, Chris [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)], Andrade, U. [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)], Noriega, H. E. [Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City (Mexico)], Aguilar, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Ahlen, S. [Boston Univ., MA (United States)], BenZvi, S. [Univ. of Rochester, NY (United States)], Bianchi, D. [Univ. degli Studi di Milano (Italy); Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF), Milano (Italy). Osservatorio Astrofisico di Brera], Brooks, D. [Univ. College London (United Kingdom)], Claybaugh, T. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Cuceu, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], de la Macorra, A. [Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City (Mexico)], DeRose, J. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], Doel, P. [Univ. College London (United Kingdom)], Emas, N. [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)], Ferraro, S. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (United States)], Forero-Romero, J. E. [Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá (Colombia)], Garcia-Quintero, C. [Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)], Gaztañaga, E. [Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Castelldefels (Spain); Univ. of Portsmouth (United Kingdom); Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Barcelona (Spain). Institute of Space Sciences (ICE-CSIC)], Gutierrez, G. [Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (FNAL), Batavia, IL (United States)], Heydenreich, S. [Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)], Honscheid, K. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States)], Howlett, C. [Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD (Australia)], Huterer, D. [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)], Ishak, M. [Univ. of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX (United States)], Joudaki, S. [Research Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain)], Joyce, R. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)], Jullo, E. [Aix-Marseille Univ., Marseille (France)], Kehoe, R. [Southern Methodist Univ., Dallas, TX (United States)], Kirkby, D. [Univ. of California, Irvine, CA (United States)], Kremin, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Krolewski, A. [Univ. of Waterloo, ON (Canada)], Lahav, O. [Univ. College London (United Kingdom)], Lambert, A. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Lamman, C. [Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA (United States)], Landriau, M. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Lange, J. U. [American University, Washington, DC (United States)], Le Guillou, L. [Sorbonne Univ., Paris (France)], Leauthaud, A. [Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, CA (United States)], Manera, M. [Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Spain); Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST) (Spain)], Meisner, A. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)], Miquel, R. [Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST) (Spain); Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona (Spain)], Nadathur, S. [Univ. of Portsmouth (United Kingdom)], Newman, J. A. [Univ. of Pittsburgh, PA (United States). Pittsburgh Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Center (PITT PACC)], Niz, G. [Universidad de Guanajuato (Mexico); Instituto Avanzado de Cosmología A. C., Mexico City (Mexico)], Palanque-Delabrouille, N. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Univ. Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette (France)], Percival, W. J. [Univ. of Waterloo, ON (Canada)], Porredon, A. [The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH (United States); Research Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain); Univ. of Edinburgh, Scotland (United Kingdom); Ruhr Univ., Bochum (Germany)], Prada, F. [Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC), Granada (Spain)], Pérez-Ràfols, I. [Univ. Politecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona (Spain)], Rossi, G. [Sejong Univ., Seoul (Korea, Republic of)], Ruggeri, R. [Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD (Australia)], Sanchez, E. [Research Centre for Energy, Environment and Technology (CIEMAT), Madrid (Spain)], Saulder, C. [Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching (Germany)], Schlegel, D. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Semenaite, A. [Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC (Australia)], Silber, J. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Sprayberry, D. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)], Sun, Z. [Tsinghua Univ., Beijing (China)], Tarlé, G. [Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (United States)], Weaver, B. A. [NSF NOIRLab, Tucson, AZ (United States)], Zarrouk, P. [Sorbonne Univ., Paris (France)], Zhou, R. [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)], Zou, H. [Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing (China). National Astronomical Observatories]. 2025-10-06. Testing gravitational physics by combining DESI DR1 and weak lensing datasets using the E_G estimator. https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.145197

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Optimal intrinsic alignment estimators in the presence of redshift-space distortions

We present estimators for quantifying intrinsic alignments in large spectroscopic surveys that efficiently capture line-of-sight (LOS) information while being relatively insensitive to redshift-space distortions (RSD). We demonstrate that changing the LOS integration range, pimax, as a function of transverse separation outperforms the conventional choice of a single pimax value. This is further improved by replacing the flat pimax cut with a LOS weighting based on shape projection and RSD. Although these estimators incorporate additional LOS information, they are projected correlations that exhibit signal-to-noise ratios comparable to 3D correlation functions, such as the IA quadrupole. Using simulations from Abacus Summit, we evaluate these estimators and provide recommended pimax values and weights for projected separations of 1 - 100 Mpc/h. These will improve measurements of intrinsic alignments in large cosmological surveys and the constraints they provide for both weak lensing and direct cosmological applications.

cosmology↗

Cosmic structure strikes back: The elimination of vector-mediated nonstandard interaction models as a mechanism for sterile neutrino dark matter production

We revisit sterile neutrino production enabled by nonstandard interactions (NSIs) among active neutrinos mediated by new bosons. We focus on vector mediators, including neutrinophilic, gauged 𝐿 𝜇 −𝐿 𝜏 , and 𝐵−𝐿 realizations, that modify in-medium dispersion and scattering, thereby altering the active-sterile conversion history. Building on a novel production framework with NSI thermal potentials and collision integrals, we compute nonthermal phase-space distributions across sterile neutrino mixing and NSI parameters and map each point to an equivalent thermal warm dark matter particle mass 𝑚 th via linear theory transfer function fitting with the cosmological structure formation Boltzmann solver. This enables a direct reinterpretation of state-of-the-art structure formation limits from Milky Way satellites, strong lensing, and the Lyman-𝛼 forest. These limits, in conjunction with x-ray decay searches, as well as results from a wide variety of particle physics experiments allow for a more complete examination of these models. We find that these vector-mediated models are ruled out when the full combination of current constraints, listed above, are taken into account. NSI scalar-mediated models and models with low reheating temperatures remain viable.

cosmology↗

Galaxy-multiplet clustering from DESI DR2

We present an efficient estimator for higher-order galaxy clustering using small groups of nearby galaxies, or multiplets. Using the Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) sample from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 2, we identify galaxy multiplets as discrete objects and measure their cross-correlations with the general galaxy field. Our results show that the multiplets exhibit stronger clustering bias as they trace more massive dark matter halos than individual galaxies. When comparing the observed clustering statistics with the mock catalogs generated from the N-body simulation AbacusSummit, we find that the mocks underpredict multiplet clustering despite reproducing the galaxy two-point auto-correlation reasonably well. This discrepancy indicates that the standard Halo Occupation Distribution (HOD) model is insufficient to describe the properties of galaxy multiplets, revealing the greater constraining power of this higher-order statistic on galaxy-halo connection and the possibility that multiplets are specific to additional assembly bias. We demonstrate that incorporating secondary biases into the HOD model improves agreement with the observed multiplet statistics, specifically by allowing galaxies to preferentially occupy halos in denser environments. Our results highlight the potential of utilizing multiplet clustering, beyond traditional two-point correlation measurements, to break degeneracies in models describing the galaxy-dark matter connection.

cosmology↗