Search NASASearch

DOE OSTI · 3030515

Do we have globally representative data to understand soil processes?

Malhotra, Avni [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000278506402)·von Fromm, Sophie F. [Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (United States)]·Bond-Lamberty, Ben [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]·Doetterl, Sebastian [Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zurich (Switzerland)]·Georgiou, Katerina [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)]·Graham, Emily B. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA (United States)]·Heckman, Katherine A. [USDA Forest Service, Houghton, MI (United States). Northern Research Station]·Jia, Ruofei [Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)]·Patel, Kaizad F. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]·Rod, Kenton A. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]·Santos, Fernanda [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000191555623)·Terrer, César [Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)]·Todd-Brown, Katherine [Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL (United States)]·Zheng, Jianqiu [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]·Hofmockel, Kirsten [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]·Bailey, Vanessa [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]

Abstract

Understanding and modeling soils and soil organic matter (SOM) are central to a variety of human needs, from food production to ecosystem management. Soil data have been collected for over a century, but the global spatial and process representativeness of soil data remains unclear. We assessed the representativeness of currently available soil data that could be used to understand a variety of SOM processes. We used 16 open-source soil databases and data from over 281,000 unique locations globally, categorizing the databases into three main data types necessary to understand SOM processes: soil carbon stocks and fluxes, mechanistic drivers of these stocks and fluxes, and soil carbon gain or loss potential. We found that stock and driver data have extensive global coverage. However, data on soil carbon gain or loss potential, particularly data describing change in soils over time such as time series data, are severely limited in their global coverage. We conclude that while significant strides have been made in measuring soil carbon stocks and fluxes, and their drivers, we are limited in global data related to changes in soils over time. Our recommendations for soil data generators are to ensure precise metadata reporting and prioritizing sampling in underrepresented areas like tropical, arctic, mountainous, wetland and arid regions. We also encourage designing revisit schemes that explicitly support change detection and reporting multi-modal datasets that can aid in model development. Targeted measurement of low coverage soil data types and regions is necessary for a range of applications including current and future biogeochemical predictions, and their management and policy implications.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Malhotra, Avni [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000278506402), von Fromm, Sophie F. [Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH (United States)], Bond-Lamberty, Ben [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)], Doetterl, Sebastian [Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule (ETH), Zurich (Switzerland)], Georgiou, Katerina [Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States); Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR (United States)], Graham, Emily B. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA (United States)], Heckman, Katherine A. [USDA Forest Service, Houghton, MI (United States). Northern Research Station], Jia, Ruofei [Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)], Patel, Kaizad F. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)], Rod, Kenton A. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)], Santos, Fernanda [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000191555623), Terrer, César [Massachusetts Inst. of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA (United States)], Todd-Brown, Katherine [Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL (United States)], Zheng, Jianqiu [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)], Hofmockel, Kirsten [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)], Bailey, Vanessa [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]. 2026-02-20. Do we have globally representative data to understand soil processes?. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-025-01301-z

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

From Remotely-Sensed SIF to Ecosystem Structure, Function, and Service: Part I - Harnessing Theory

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is a remotely sensed optical signal emitted during the light reactions of photosynthesis. The past two decades have witnessed an explosion in availability of SIF data at increasingly higher spatial and temporal resolutions, sparking applications in diverse research sectors (e.g., ecology, agriculture, hydrology, climate, and socioeconomics). These applications must deal with complexities caused by tremendous variations in scale and the impacts of interacting and superimposing plant physiology and three-dimensional vegetation structure on the emission and scattering of SIF. At present, these complexities have not been overcome. To advance future research, the two companion reviews aim to (1) develop an analytical framework for inferring terrestrial vegetation structures and function that are tied to SIF emission, (2) synthesize progress and identify challenges in SIF research via the lens of multi-sector applications, and (3) map out actionable solutions to tackle these challenges and offer our vision for research priorities over the next 5–10 years based on the proposed analytical framework. This paper is the first of the two companion reviews, and theory oriented. It introduces a theoretically rigorous yet practically applicable analytical framework. Guided by this framework, we offer theoretical perspectives on three overarching questions: (1) The forward (mechanism) question—How are the dynamics of SIF affected by terrestrial ecosystem structure and function? (2) The inference question: What aspects of terrestrial ecosystem structure, function, and service can be reliably inferred from remotely sensed SIF and how? (3) The innovation question: What innovations are needed to realize the full potential of SIF remote sensing for real-world applications under climate change? The analytical framework elucidates that process complexity must be appreciated in inferring ecosystem structure and function from the observed SIF; this framework can serve as a diagnosis and inference tool for versatile applications across diverse spatial and temporal scales.

carbon fluxes