Diffusion-MBIR: 3D sparse view CT reconstruction from 2D diffusion

Chung, Hyungjin [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology] (ORCID:0000000332020893); Ryu, Dohoon [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology]; McCann, Michael Thompson [Los Alamos National Laboratory] (ORCID:000000017645252X); Klasky, Marc Louis [Los Alamos National Laboratory] (ORCID:0000000212830891); Ye, Jong Chul [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology] (ORCID:0000000197639609)

doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02159

DOE OSTI · 3365122

Diffusion-MBIR: 3D sparse view CT reconstruction from 2D diffusion

Chung, Hyungjin [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology] (ORCID:0000000332020893)·Ryu, Dohoon [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology]·McCann, Michael Thompson [Los Alamos National Laboratory] (ORCID:000000017645252X)·Klasky, Marc Louis [Los Alamos National Laboratory] (ORCID:0000000212830891)·Ye, Jong Chul [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology] (ORCID:0000000197639609)

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

3D reconstruction 42 ENGINEERING 62 RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING Diffusion models Model-based Iterative Reconstruction.Sparse-view CT

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Chung, Hyungjin [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology] (ORCID:0000000332020893), Ryu, Dohoon [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology], McCann, Michael Thompson [Los Alamos National Laboratory] (ORCID:000000017645252X), Klasky, Marc Louis [Los Alamos National Laboratory] (ORCID:0000000212830891), Ye, Jong Chul [Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology] (ORCID:0000000197639609). 2026-03-20. Diffusion-MBIR: 3D sparse view CT reconstruction from 2D diffusion. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02159

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Improving 3D reconstruction quality for root phenotyping: assessing the impact of camera calibration and imaging parameters

Arate 3D reconstruction is essential for high-throughput plant phenotyping, particularly for studying complex structures such as root systems. While photogrammetry and Structure from Motion (SfM) techniques have become widely used for 3D root imaging, the camera settings used are often underreported in studies, and the impact of camera calibration on model accuracyccu remains largely underexplored in plant science. In this study, we systematically evaluate the effects of focus, aperture, exposure time, and gain settings on the quality of 3D root models made with a multi-camera scanning system. We show through a series of experiments that calibration significantly improves model quality, with focus misalignment and shallow depth of field (DoF) being the most important factors affecting reconstruction accuracy. Our results further show that proper calibration has a greater effect on reducing noise than filtering it during post-processing, emphasizing the importance of optimizing image acquisition rather than relying solely on computational corrections. This work improves the repeatability and accuracy of 3D root imaging for phenotyping pipelines by giving useful calibration guidelines. This leads to better trait quantification for use in crop research and plant breeding in downstream analysis.

3D reconstruction↗

DOE OSTI2024

Improved Three-Dimensional Reconstructions in Electron Ptychography through Defocus Series Measurements

A detailed analysis of ptychography for three-dimensional (3D) phase reconstructions of thick specimens is performed. Here, we introduce multi-focus ptychography, which incorporates a 4D-STEM defocus series to enhance the quality of 3D reconstructions along the beam direction through a higher overdetermination ratio. This method is compared with established multi-slice ptychography techniques, such as conventional ptychography, regularized ptychography, and multi-mode ptychography. Additionally, we contrast multi-focus ptychography with an alternative method that uses virtual optical sectioning through a reconstructed scattering matrix (S-matrix), which offers more precise 3D structure information compared to conventional ptychography. Our findings from multiple 3D reconstructions based on simulated and experimental data demonstrate that multi-focus ptychography surpasses other techniques, particularly in accurately reconstructing the surfaces and interface regions of thick specimens.

3D reconstruction↗