Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 3367254

Testing the Common Platform LLRF with a 197 MHz NCRF Cavity

Mai, Samson [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0009000935931837)·Bachimanchi, R. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)]·Fahey, K. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·Latshaw, J. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)]·Mernick, K. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·McCooey, M. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·Narayan, G. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·Plawski, T. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)]·Settle, J. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)]·Severino, F. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]·Singh, A. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Common Platform is the hardware that will support the new LLRF platform to be used for the Electron-Ion Collider. The Common Platform features a carrier board that is used to interface with a variety of daughter for different applications. This paper details the testing that was done using the Common Platform and an RF Digitizer Daugther Board. Firstly, the firmware and software development is discussed followed by a description of the controls algorithms used in the testing. Then, testing and verification of the platform with a 197 MHz NCRF cavity is discussed. The paper concludes with results from the testing and the path forward.

Explore related subjects

42 ENGINEERING43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Mai, Samson [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0009000935931837), Bachimanchi, R. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)], Fahey, K. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], Latshaw, J. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)], Mernick, K. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], McCooey, M. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], Narayan, G. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], Plawski, T. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)], Settle, J. [Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA (United States)], Severino, F. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)], Singh, A. [Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)]. 2026-05-21. Testing the Common Platform LLRF with a 197 MHz NCRF Cavity. https://doi.org/10.2172/3367254

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗