Physics basis for the reference flat-top plasma scenario in the ST–E1 fusion power plant

McNamara, Steven A. M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000204775247); Abouelazayem, S. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000062919854); Alieva, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000245734951); Anastopoulos Tzanis, M. S. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000165643152); Berkery, J. W. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000280623210); Dnestrovskii, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000248279421); Dudkovskaia, A. V. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000168903079); Janky, F. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000194887188); Kang, J. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000298454646); Lopez, N. A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000155663731); Maartensson, E. N. J. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000072898516); Maingi, R. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000312388121); Marsden, C. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000313225236); Medvedev, S. Y. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000293589402); Nelson, A. O. [Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0000000296121936); Nemytov, V. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000764902635); Parisi, J. F. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States); Marathon Fusion, San Francisco, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000313287154); Ren, Y. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000345719046); Robinson, M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000307091219); Romanelli, M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000348974843); Scarabosio, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom); LINKS Foundation, Torino (Italy)] (ORCID:0000000273726975); Scarpari, M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000162460131); Sladkomedova, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000200129328); Stoltzfus-Dueck, T. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000325876298); Takase, Y. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000248465267); Varje, J. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000341372436); Vekshina, E. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000197715579); Wilson, C. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000788603867); Zhang, X. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000337755821); Zimmermann, C. F. B. [Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0000000331431471)

doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ae5f33

DOE OSTI · 3378207

Physics basis for the reference flat-top plasma scenario in the ST–E1 fusion power plant

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Milestone-Based Fusion Energy Development Program, Tokamak Energy has completed the pre-concept design of the ST–E1 fusion power plant. ST–E1 is envisaged to operate in two phases: a pilot plant phase, targeting sustained net power production of 300 - 500 MWe for a duration >1 hr, followed by a commercial power plant phase targeting steady-state operations and a normalised overnight capital cost of ⩽12 000 $\$$/kWe. The design process adopted was highly iterative, integrating all major plant systems and progressing in a phased fidelity approach. At the pre-conceptual stage, the emphasis has been on exploring the design space, identifying the main system-level trade-offs, and making the key decisions that define the overall plant concept, rather than optimising a single operating point. This paper, part of a focused collection detailing the ST–E1 pre-concept design, addresses the development of a series of reference flat-top plasma operating points for the pilot plant phase. A modelling workflow was established to develop and assess candidate plasma design points and explore key dependencies. The workflow includes integrated core plasma modelling, magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) stability assessment, equilibrium generation, scrape-off-layer and exhaust modelling, heating & current drive design and optimisation, and turbulent transport modelling. Using this framework, the impact of several key parameters on the flat-top operating space was investigated, including the density limit, core radiation fraction and divertor power loading, level of external heating and curent drive power and assumed pedestal characteristics. The MHD stability, controllability and micro-stability characteristics of these plasmas were also analysed. These investigations informed the definition of a set of fully non-inductive, flat-top reference operating points that satisfy the high-level ST–E1 mission, including a low and high density case, a case that is stable to resistive wall modes and a case with reduced divertor power loading.

Explore related subjects

ST–E1 Tokamak Energy fusion pilot plant integrated modelling low aspect ratio steady-state

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

McNamara, Steven A. M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000204775247), Abouelazayem, S. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000062919854), Alieva, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000245734951), Anastopoulos Tzanis, M. S. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000165643152), Berkery, J. W. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000280623210), Dnestrovskii, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000248279421), Dudkovskaia, A. V. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000168903079), Janky, F. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000194887188), Kang, J. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000298454646), Lopez, N. A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000155663731), Maartensson, E. N. J. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000072898516), Maingi, R. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000312388121), Marsden, C. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000313225236), Medvedev, S. Y. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000293589402), Nelson, A. O. [Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0000000296121936), Nemytov, V. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000764902635), Parisi, J. F. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States); Marathon Fusion, San Francisco, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000313287154), Ren, Y. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000345719046), Robinson, M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000307091219), Romanelli, M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000348974843), Scarabosio, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom); LINKS Foundation, Torino (Italy)] (ORCID:0000000273726975), Scarpari, M. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000162460131), Sladkomedova, A. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000200129328), Stoltzfus-Dueck, T. [Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), Princeton, NJ (United States)] (ORCID:0000000325876298), Takase, Y. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000248465267), Varje, J. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000341372436), Vekshina, E. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000197715579), Wilson, C. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0009000788603867), Zhang, X. [Tokamak Energy Ltd., Oxford (United Kingdom)] (ORCID:0000000337755821), Zimmermann, C. F. B. [Columbia Univ., New York, NY (United States)] (ORCID:0000000331431471). 2026-07-10. Physics basis for the reference flat-top plasma scenario in the ST–E1 fusion power plant. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ae5f33

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

DOE OSTI2026

Power and particle exhaust in the ST-E1 fusion power plant

Power exhaust challenges and potential solutions for a 5 m major radius, low-aspect ratio burning tokamak have been explored. 1D edge plasma models have been used to screen for access to detachment using short and long outer divertor legs in double and single null configurations, using Ar as the primary impurity and assuming tungsten plasma-facing components (PFCs). These show that detachment access can be accessed for all but the most conservative assumptions on scrape-off layer (SOL) width and power, but that trade-offs will be required between magnet engineering and the size of the acceptable window of as-yet uncertain plasma parameters. SOLPS-ITER was used to further model selected plasma scenarios, confirming that Ar seeding can be used to achieve dissipative divertor scenarios with peak deposited heat fluxes below 15 MWm -2 . Initial scoping of first wall loads and positioning of limiters has been carried out, showing the feasibility of protecting the breeding blanket wall during steady state without impeding tritium breeding. Initial PFC technology selection is also presented, identifying this as a critical area where further work is needed to find an attractive solution for helium-cooled PFCs that can handle high heat fluxes without excessive power requirements. Key questions and trade-offs for concept development have been identified, including: how to achieve high radiation for reduction of SOL power without core performance degradation; whether power exhaust can be well-controlled in a double null plasma; mechanical design and materials challenges of high-heat flux PFCs; and control of material erosion, redeposition and tritium retention.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

DOE OSTI2026

First Wall Design of a Tokamak Pilot Plant Using a Monte Carlo Model for 3-D Heat Flux Deposition

We present a method for calculating the heat fluxes deposited on nonaxisymmetric tokamak first wall components, allowing for a first-of-its-kind model for power handling in the tokamak far scrape-off layer (SOL). The DIV3D Monte Carlo model features strict global power conservation and can calculate the finite cross-field plasma transport into magnetically-shadowed regions, which is significant when dealing with meter-scale shadows introduced by components such as poloidal limiters or antennas. As a case study, we apply the DIV3D model to inform the distribution of first wall poloidal limiters in an ARC-class reactor device. We demonstrate that discrete protection limiters can efficiently reduce peak heat fluxes on recessed breeder wall components in the presence of significant far-SOL plasma fluxes. By varying the toroidal periodicity and radial standoff depth of the limiters, we demonstrate one of the tradeoffs that must be considered in first wall design: more limiters provide greater protection, but at the cost of reduced breeding performance. We also present the impact that radial misalignments between limiters would have on first wall power loading.

Monte Carlo methods↗

DOE OSTI2026

The U.S. Fusion Materials Community Roadmap: Near-term research priorities for the development of plasma-facing and structural materials for fusion power plants

In response to the needs of a rapidly growing private fusion industry, the U.S. Fusion Materials Coordinating Committee (FMCC) and the broader U.S. fusion materials research community undertook an extensive effort to create a comprehensive roadmap for fusion materials development. The result of this effort was the U.S. Fusion Materials Community Roadmap (US-FMCR), which describes the steps needed to advance the technical maturity of leading candidates for plasma-facing materials and structural materials for fusion power plants from laboratory-scale experiments to a point of sufficient technological readiness for industrial adoption and implementation. However, researchers face significant resource constraints as well as very aggressive pilot plant development timelines. Thus, the research strategies detailed in the US-FMCR require further assessment to downselect the specific tasks that must be prioritized within the next two to three years, in order to make the most efficient use of funding, human resources, and experimental facilities. This paper presents an overview of the US-FMCR and its development process. We also present the subset of research objectives that the FMCC identified as the most urgent research priorities for the U.S. fusion materials research community. The state-of-the-art of materials research is also highlighted for each class of materials considered in the US-FMCR. The recommendations presented here integrate an extensive evaluation of the current status of fusion materials research with a broad cross-section of opinion from the wider U.S. fusion community.

Ferry, Sara [Massachusetts Institute of Technology↗