Search NASASearch

DOE OSTI · 3453390

Methods and recommendations for large-scale deflagration testing of battery energy storage system enclosures

Abstract

UL Solutions produced this report as a summary of a test series executed at Sandia National Laboratories that they funded. This report was approved for release by UL Solutions in October 2025 and released in 2026 on their website at https://www.ul.com/insights/methods-and-recommendations-large-scale-deflagration-testing-battery-energy-storage-system.

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Gaudet, Benjamin [UL Solutions] (ORCID:0009000641971200), Barowy, Adam [UL Research Institutes, Fire Safety Research Institute] (ORCID:0000000154484037), Schraiber, Alex [UL Solutions], Shurtz, Randy [Sandia National Laboratories (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)] (ORCID:0000000227420334). 2025-10-01. Methods and recommendations for large-scale deflagration testing of battery energy storage system enclosures. https://doi.org/10.2172/3453390

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

Lithium-Ion Battery Design for Grid-Scale Energy Storage App

A software that delivers parameters from energy storage system (ESS) to container, rack, module and single cell design, as well as data analysis on arbitrage energy and frequency regulation of ESS in different regions, has been developed. The Lithium-ion Battery Design for Grid-scale Energy Storage App V1.0 has the capability to output the system, module and cell design with the energy, power, capacity, group method, cost of single cell, and single cell test protocol which break down from input energy storage system data in different regions. The default chemistry of the battery is LiFePO4 and graphite. The energy density of the graphite/LiFePO 4 pouch cell ranges from 100 Wh/kg to 200 Wh/Kg in the software. Graphite/LiFePO 4 pouch cell (up to 1Ah in lab) manufacturing line is also built and can be used to evaluate the test protocol, moreover, for electrolyte evaluation in other ESMI seedling projects. The software enables rapid prototyping to accelerate energy storage research, development, and manufacturing.

Liu, Dianying [Pacific Northwest National Laborato

Battery Material Synthesis and Scalability using a 50L Taylor Vortex Reactor (Final CRADA Report)

Under this agreement, Laminar will loan Argonne a 50L Taylor Vortex Reactor (TVR) and provide mechanical troubleshooting guidance and consulting to ensure the successful setup of the pilot-scale synthesis process. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will allocate funding for the labor and materials required for the study. To evaluate the physical and electrochemical properties of the materials produced by the 50L TVR, Argonne will perform comprehensive characterizations, including XRD, SEM, PSA, ICP, tap density, and coin half-cell testing. Throughout the collaboration, Argonne will provide feedback and recommendations for mechanical improvements to the reactor system. Furthermore, Argonne will credit Laminar as a collaborator in any presentations or publications resulting from data generated by the system. Laminar will retain no rights to experimental results or intellectual property generated through the experiments conducted with the 50L TVR at Argonne.

25 ENERGY STORAGE

Application of System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) to a NASA Concept Electric Aircraft Battery System

System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is a systems-based hazard analysis method that identifies unsafe interactions and control deficiencies in complex systems but has been rarely used for NASA programs in favor of more well-established hazard analyses. To evaluate its applicability, a NASA Safety and Mission Assurance (SMA) team applied the STPA method to an early-stage hybrid electrified aircraft concept, focusing on the energy storage system and electric powertrain. Objectives include assessing STPA’s value relative to traditional methods and its suitability for early design phases. Activities include team training, system review, detailed STPA execution, and comparison with traditional analyses. Findings show STPA provides a structured, comprehensive hazard evaluation and can identify additional risks by expanding analysis boundaries. However, traditional methods can yield similar results when applied rigorously, though they typically require more mature designs. Overall, STPA is a valuable addition, particularly for early development, informing safety requirements and supporting preliminary hazard analyses. Further pilot applications are recommended.

Electric Aviation