Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 3484855

Rethinking the soil core microbiome

Lee, Jaejin [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000297939473)·Rolón, Bolívar Aponte [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000225444551)·de Lorimier, Phillip [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0009000035439644)·Ané, Jean‐Michel [University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000231289439)·Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò [University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI (United States)] (ORCID:000000031589947X)·Carrell, Alyssa A. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000311424709)·Chai, Yen Ning [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Joint BioEnergy Institute, Berkeley, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000224379524)·Chandrasoma, Janith [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:000000026357500X)·Geerdes, Nicole [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0009000159049533)·Infante, Valentina [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States)] (ORCID:0009000967051754)·Kristy, Brandon [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000324217143)·Martin, Stanton [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)]·Pascoe, Imani [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000187843542)·Patra, Rounak [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:000000025822466X)·Radmer, Lorien [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000325005062)·Rush, Tomás Allen [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000232071466)·Shita, Ndenum Suzzy [The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States); University of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000285327146)·Suratt, Andie [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000277683693)·Suthers, Patrick F. [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000255609986)·Cregger, Melissa A. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:000000018329366X)·Howe, Adina [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:000000027705343X)·Lebeis, Sarah [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000194179678)·Scheller, Henrik Vibe [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Joint BioEnergy Institute, Berkeley, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000267023560)

Abstract

The concept of a core microbiome emerged from host-associated research to describe microbial members or functions conserved across clearly defined spatial, temporal, and biological boundaries. In soil- and plant-associated microbiome research, however, the term has increasingly shifted toward analytically defined subsets selected using study-specific thresholds or criteria. Synthesizing recent literature and cross-site analyses of bioenergy crop field soils, we show that the original biological meaning of the core microbiome has been blurred by dataset-specific analytical criteria. Taxa designated as ‘core’ were highly sensitive to methodological choices and often reflected explanatory value rather than conserved biological membership. Moreover, many studies that identify taxonomic ‘core’ members interpret their significance in functional terms, suggesting that functional conservation may be the biological interest. Taxonomic conservation may not be the most biologically meaningful target in highly heterogeneous soil and rhizosphere systems, where functional conservation may persist despite taxonomic turnover. Accordingly, ‘core microbiome’ should be reserved for microbial components explicitly demonstrated to be conserved across defined spatial, temporal, and environmental dimensions and linked to conserved ecological functions, while taxa selected for explanatory value are better described as ‘explanatory subsets of taxa’. Greater terminological precision will improve cross-study comparability and strengthen ecological inference in plant–soil microbiome research.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lee, Jaejin [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000297939473), Rolón, Bolívar Aponte [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000225444551), de Lorimier, Phillip [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0009000035439644), Ané, Jean‐Michel [University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000231289439), Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò [University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI (United States)] (ORCID:000000031589947X), Carrell, Alyssa A. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000311424709), Chai, Yen Ning [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Joint BioEnergy Institute, Berkeley, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000224379524), Chandrasoma, Janith [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:000000026357500X), Geerdes, Nicole [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0009000159049533), Infante, Valentina [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States)] (ORCID:0009000967051754), Kristy, Brandon [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000324217143), Martin, Stanton [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)], Pascoe, Imani [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000187843542), Patra, Rounak [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:000000025822466X), Radmer, Lorien [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000325005062), Rush, Tomás Allen [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:0000000232071466), Shita, Ndenum Suzzy [The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States); University of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000285327146), Suratt, Andie [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000277683693), Suthers, Patrick F. [University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000255609986), Cregger, Melissa A. [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States); The Center for Bioenergy Innovation, Oak Ridge, TN (United States)] (ORCID:000000018329366X), Howe, Adina [Iowa State University, Ames, IA (United States); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL (United States)] (ORCID:000000027705343X), Lebeis, Sarah [University of Wisconsin‐Madison, WI (United States); Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI (United States)] (ORCID:0000000194179678), Scheller, Henrik Vibe [Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States); Joint BioEnergy Institute, Berkeley, CA (United States)] (ORCID:0000000267023560). 2026-08-17. Rethinking the soil core microbiome. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71509

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Data for "A 13-year record indicates differences in the duration and depth of soil carbon accrual among potential bioenergy crops"

Data sets for material included in "A 13-year record indicates differences in the duration and depth of soil carbon accrual among potential bioenergy crops" by Kantola et al., 2025, in Global Change Biology Bioenergy. Data include soil organic carbon (SOC), carbon stable isotope ratios, annual belowground biomass, and annual post-harvest litter for four crops, maize/soybean, miscanthus, switchgrass, and prairie, between 2008 and 2021.

bioenergy crops↗

Simulated Land Allocation, Nitrogen Use, and Nitrogen Loss in the Mississippi Atchafalaya River Basin for Various RFS2 (Renewable Fuel Standard) Policy Scenarios

Total nitrogen leaching rates were calculated over the Mississippi Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB) using an integrated economic-biophysical modeling approach. Land allocation for corn production and total nitrogen application rates were calculated for crop reporting districts using the Biofuel and Environmental Policy Analysis Model (BEPAM) for 5 RFS2 policy scenarios. These were used as input in the Integrated BIosphere Simulator-Agricultural Version (Agro-IBIS) and the Terrestrial Hydrologic Model with Biogeochemistry (THMB) to calculate the nitrogen loss. Land allocation and total nitrogen application simulations were simulated for the period 2016-2030 for 303 crop reporting districts (https://www.nass.usda.gov/Data_and_Statistics/County_Data_Files/Frequently_Asked_Questions/county_list.txt). The final 2030 values are reported here. Both are stored in csv files. Units for land allocation are million ha and nitrogen application are million kg. The nitrogen leaching rates were modeled with a spatial resolution of 5' x 5' using the North American Datum of 1983 projection and stored in NetCDF files. The 30-year average is calculated over the last 30 years of the 45 years being simulated. Leaching rates are calculated in kg-N/ha.

bioenergy crops↗