MRV Challenge 3: velocity and passive scalar comparison in a 3D turbulent flow

Benson, Mike [ORNL] (ORCID:000000023210116X); Nguyen, Thien D. [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000159722006); Romig, Swantje [University of Rostock]; Dagobert, Louis [Binghamton University (SUNY)]; Borup, Daniel [Borup Solutions, LLC]; Bruschewski, Martin [University of Rostock]; John, Kristine [University of Rostock]; Grundmann, Sven [University of Rostock]; Song, Simon [Hanyang University, Korea]; Dong, Hangfei [Hanyang University, Korea]; Banko, Andrew [U.S. Military Academy]; Elkins, Christopher [Elkins Engineering, LLC]; Villafane, Laura [University of Illinois Urbana Champaign]; Bandopadhyay, Tuhin [University of Illinois Urbana Champaign]

doi:10.1007/s00348-026-04234-x

DOE OSTI · 3682538

MRV Challenge 3: velocity and passive scalar comparison in a 3D turbulent flow

Benson, Mike [ORNL] (ORCID:000000023210116X)·Nguyen, Thien D. [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000159722006)·Romig, Swantje [University of Rostock]·Dagobert, Louis [Binghamton University (SUNY)]·Borup, Daniel [Borup Solutions, LLC]·Bruschewski, Martin [University of Rostock]·John, Kristine [University of Rostock]·Grundmann, Sven [University of Rostock]·Song, Simon [Hanyang University, Korea]·Dong, Hangfei [Hanyang University, Korea]·Banko, Andrew [U.S. Military Academy]·Elkins, Christopher [Elkins Engineering, LLC]·Villafane, Laura [University of Illinois Urbana Champaign]·Bandopadhyay, Tuhin [University of Illinois Urbana Champaign]

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The third iteration of a magnetic resonance velocimetry (MRV) challenge comparison activity consisting of 3D flow measurements for a turbulent flow in a water channel moving past centrally positioned cubic obstacles is reported. In this challenge iteration, MRV measurements are coupled with either temperature or concentration measurements to extend the diagnostic utility. Five research teams from around the world conducted the measurements on a single shared apparatus. The water channel included partial elements along the channel sidewalls that varied in height and precluded easy optical accessibility. In addition to a turbulent mainstream flow, a secondary flow entered the channel between the second and third cubic elements from a square injector hole at the channel bottom wall. The injector jet interacts with the mainstream flow and mixes turbulently as it advects downstream. For the selected flow regime and water solutions used as working fluids, the mixing of the higher temperature or concentration through the secondary flow with the mainstream flow satisfies the same dynamics so that both temperature and concentration fields behave as passive scalars and can be directly compared. The measurements are explained in detail by each participating team, and the results are interpolated onto a common grid and compared using line profiles, contour plots, and isosurfaces.

Keep this discovery

BibTeX RIS

Benson, Mike [ORNL] (ORCID:000000023210116X), Nguyen, Thien D. [ORNL] (ORCID:0000000159722006), Romig, Swantje [University of Rostock], Dagobert, Louis [Binghamton University (SUNY)], Borup, Daniel [Borup Solutions, LLC], Bruschewski, Martin [University of Rostock], John, Kristine [University of Rostock], Grundmann, Sven [University of Rostock], Song, Simon [Hanyang University, Korea], Dong, Hangfei [Hanyang University, Korea], Banko, Andrew [U.S. Military Academy], Elkins, Christopher [Elkins Engineering, LLC], Villafane, Laura [University of Illinois Urbana Champaign], Bandopadhyay, Tuhin [University of Illinois Urbana Champaign]. 2026-08-01. MRV Challenge 3: velocity and passive scalar comparison in a 3D turbulent flow. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-026-04234-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related discoveries

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The NASA Turbulent Heat Flux (THX) Experiments: Summary and Lessons Learned

The Turbulent Heat Flux (THX) experiments were conducted at NASA Glenn Research Center (GRC) in order to collect measurements of velocities and temperatures for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) validation of heated flows, with a focus on propulsion system components. The experiments spanned 5 phases; four of which were conducted in the GRC AeroAcoustic Propulsion Laboratory (AAPL) using the Small Hot Jet Flow Rig (SHJAR). In addition to making velocity measurements with Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV), the THX experiments introduced a new Raman-scattering based capability to measure temperatures. Computational studies were also conducted for each of the experimental configurations, in order to provide a baseline of expected CFD results and conduct an assessment of the capability of various CFD approaches for calculating flows where the turbulent transport of heat was important. Two of the collected sets of data were used for American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Propulsion Aerodynamic Workshops (PAWs). The data set from the 5th phase, collected for heated supersonic jets, was also used to construct new validation cases for the NASA Turbulence Model Resource (TMR). This paper provides an overview of the experiments and associated computations for each of the 5 test phases. Key experimental findings are presented. Lessons learned are provided concerning the effect of computational modeling choice on accuracy of predicting turbulent flows where thermal transport is important. Emphasis is placed on comparing Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes approaches with large-eddy simulation approaches. The benefits of utilizing a conjugate heat transfer method in conjunction with CFD solver for film cooling is demonstrated.

RANS↗

NASA NTRS2014

Analytical Model for Steady Flow through a Finite Channel with One Porous Wall with Arbitrary Variable Suction or Injection

This paper presents an exact solution of two-dimensional laminar flow through a finite length channel with one porous wall. It improves upon previous solutions by (1) satisfying the no-slip boundary condition at the channel dead end, (2) adding a turbulent term to the porous wall boundary condition, (3) allowing for arbitrary variable suction or injection across the porous wall, and (4) model validation against new cryogenic liquid hydrogen and oxygen experimental data. Of particular interest in the current work is the modeling of cryogenic propellant flow through a porous liquid acquisition device (LAD) screen and channel inside a propellant tank. First, a detailed review of the literature is presented for previously attempted solutions to channel flow with one porous wall. Next, the governing equations, boundary conditions, and model assumptions are used to derive the analytical flow solution and present general model results for pressure and velocity fields within the channel. Then, the model solution is compared with horizontal LAD channel flow data in liquid oxygen as well as vertical LAD channel flow data in an inverted outflow configuration in liquid hydrogen. Model results are used to update the static cryogenic bubble point pressure model with a dynamic bubble point term which factors in enhanced convection and cooling at the screen during propellant outflow. Convective heat transfer at the LAD screen during outflow is also quantified by comparing model and data. The new analytical flow solution with the dynamic bubble point model is shown to compare well with available cryogenic experimental data

Navier Stokes Equations↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Improvements to RANS Modeling for Aeroheating Predictions on Blunt Bodies

Accurate predictions of aeroheating are critical for designing thermal protection systems for planetary entry vehicles. For larger vehicles, turbulence in the boundary layer can substantially increase convective heating. This turbulence must be accurately modeled to ensure the thermal protection system is sufficient. The majority of hypersonic turbulence model development and validation focuses on boundary layers developing over flat-plates or sharp cones; these cases are substantially different than the boundary layer that develops over the heatshield of a blunt body traveling at hypersonic speeds. Planetary missions often use blunt body geometries, such as the 70-degree sphere-cone favored by Mars missions or the 45-degree sphere-cone planned for the upcoming DAVINCI mission. Due to smaller vehicle size and the lower velocities in the stagnation region, planetary entry vehicles have relatively low Reynolds numbers. Surface curvature and high enthalpy gradients create additional challenges. These difficulties must be addressed to obtain high accuracy needed for the ambitious planetary missions in the upcoming decade. This work focuses on both assessing and improving Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models for blunt-body geometries typical of planetary entry vehicles, with a focus on one-equation and two-equation formulations.

Mars2020↗