Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “AEROELASTICITY”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 181 records · Page 10

Using FUN3D for Aeroelastic, Sonic Boom, and AeroPropulsoServoElastic (APSE) Analyses of a Supersonic Configuration

An overview of recent applications of the FUN3D CFD code to computational aeroelastic, sonic boom, and aeropropulsoservoelasticity (APSE) analyses of a low-boom supersonic configuration is presented. The overview includes details of the computational models developed including multiple unstructured CFD grids suitable for aeroelastic and sonic boom analyses. In addition, aeroelastic Reduced-Order Models (ROMs) are generated and used to rapidly compute the aeroelastic response and utter boundaries at multiple flight conditions.

Silva, Walter A.↗

Aeroelastic Indicial Response Reduced-Order Modeling for Flexible Flight Vehicles

A reduced-order modeling method capable of providing computationally efficient predictions of the nonlinear, unsteady aerodynamics encountered by flexible flight vehicles under- going forced oscillations is presented. Models are developed using indicial response theory, which characterizes a vehicle’s dynamics through identification of time-accurate aerodynamic responses due to step changes in the vehicle-state parameters, e.g., angle-of-attack, pitch rate. A coupled computational fluid dynamics aeroelastic analysis is proposed for identifying step (indicial) responses of flexible vehicles. In this approach, aeroelastic indicial responses are simulated via prescribed rigid body motions, while fluid-structure interactions are captured at the subiterative level through coupling to a linear modal structural solver. A nonlinear extension of indicial response theory is applied through time-dependent linear interpolation of a database of locally linear aeroelastic step responses. Reduced-order models are then created using the mathematical principle of convolution applied to the interpolated aeroelastic indicial responses to predict the time-dependent aerodynamic response of a flexible vehicle to any arbitrary prescribed flight maneuver. The NASA FUN3D computational fluid dynamics solver is utilized for simulating full-order trajectories and indicial response functions. Aerodynamic predictions were generated for the X-56A aircraft undergoing a series of harmonic forced oscillations. The s are shown to provide a practical option for evaluating the unsteady aerodynamics of flexible vehicles using high-fidelity simulations.

Hiller, Brett↗

Simulation of Non-Linear Transonic Aeroelastic Behavior on the B-2

At high subsonic flight speeds, large flexible aircraft begin to encounter unsteady airloads which are not predicted by most currently available aerodynamic analysis and design methods. With increasing speed and the development of transonic flow and shocks, viscous effects quickly become very important, and flow separation can occur. The Northrop Grumman USAF B-2 Bomber encountered a nonlinear aeroelastic Residual Pitch Oscillation (RPO) under these conditions. Simulation studies were performed with the Computational Aeroelasticity Program-Transonic Small Disturbance, Viscous (CAPTSDv) computer program to evaluate its ability to predict these nonlinear aeroelastic responses. Open and closed loop simulations were performed to assess the participation of the flight control system. Control, system actuator hysteresis characteristics were modeled and found to be a significant participant in the RPO phenomenon. Simulations were also performed for varying Mach numbers and altitudes to establish the stability boundaries and compare with flight test data. These CAPTSDv simulations compared well with flight data and revealed many potential further modeling enhancements.

Residual pitch oscillation↗

Aeroelastic Optimization Study Based on the X-56A Model

One way to increase the aircraft fuel efficiency is to reduce structural weight while maintaining adequate structural airworthiness, both statically and aeroelastically. A design process which incorporates the object-oriented multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization (MDAO) tool and the aeroelastic effects of high fidelity finite element models to characterize the design space was successfully developed and established. This paper presents two multidisciplinary design optimization studies using an object-oriented MDAO tool developed at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center. The first study demonstrates the use of aeroelastic tailoring concepts to minimize the structural weight while meeting the design requirements including strength, buckling, and flutter. Such an approach exploits the anisotropic capabilities of the fiber composite materials chosen for this analytical exercise with ply stacking sequence. A hybrid and discretization optimization approach improves accuracy and computational efficiency of a global optimization algorithm. The second study presents a flutter mass balancing optimization study for the fabricated flexible wing of the X-56A model since a desired flutter speed band is required for the active flutter suppression demonstration during flight testing. The results of the second study provide guidance to modify the wing design and move the design flutter speeds back into the flight envelope so that the original objective of X-56A flight test can be accomplished successfully. The second case also demonstrates that the object-oriented MDAO tool can handle multiple analytical configurations in a single optimization run.

flutter constraints↗

Static Aeroelastic Analysis with an Inviscid Cartesian Method

An embedded-boundary, Cartesian-mesh flow solver is coupled with a three degree-of-freedom structural model to perform static, aeroelastic analysis of complex aircraft geometries. The approach solves a nonlinear, aerostructural system of equations using a loosely-coupled strategy. An open-source, 3-D discrete-geometry engine is utilized to deform a triangulated surface geometry according to the shape predicted by the structural model under the computed aerodynamic loads. The deformation scheme is capable of modeling large deflections and is applicable to the design of modern, very-flexible transport wings. The coupling interface is modular so that aerodynamic or structural analysis methods can be easily swapped or enhanced. After verifying the structural model with comparisons to Euler beam theory, two applications of the analysis method are presented as validation. The first is a relatively stiff, transport wing model which was a subject of a recent workshop on aeroelasticity. The second is a very flexible model recently tested in a low speed wind tunnel. Both cases show that the aeroelastic analysis method produces results in excellent agreement with experimental data.

Aeroelastic↗

Preliminary Assessment of Optimal Longitudinal-Mode Control for Drag Reduction through Distributed Aeroelastic Shaping

The emergence of advanced lightweight materials is resulting in a new generation of lighter, flexible, more-efficient airframes that are enabling concepts for active aeroelastic wing-shape control to achieve greater flight efficiency and increased safety margins. These elastically shaped aircraft concepts require non-traditional methods for large-scale multi-objective flight control that simultaneously seek to gain aerodynamic efficiency in terms of drag reduction while performing traditional command-tracking tasks as part of a complete guidance and navigation solution. This paper presents results from a preliminary study of a notional multi-objective control law for an aeroelastic flexible-wing aircraft controlled through distributed continuous leading and trailing edge control surface actuators. This preliminary study develops and analyzes a multi-objective control law derived from optimal linear quadratic methods on a longitudinal vehicle dynamics model with coupled aeroelastic dynamics. The controller tracks commanded attack-angle while minimizing drag and controlling wing twist and bend. This paper presents an overview of the elastic aircraft concept, outlines the coupled vehicle model, presents the preliminary control law formulation and implementation, presents results from simulation, provides analysis, and concludes by identifying possible future areas for research

aeroelastic↗

Aeroelasticity of Axially Loaded Aerodynamic Structures for Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft

This paper presents an aeroelastic finite-element formulation for axially loaded aerodynamic structures. The presence of axial loading causes the bending and torsional sitffnesses to change. For aircraft with axially loaded structures such as the truss-braced wing aircraft, the aeroelastic behaviors of such structures are nonlinear and depend on the aerodynamic loading exerted on these structures. Under axial strain, a tensile force is created which can influence the stiffness of the overall aircraft structure. This tension stiffening is a geometric nonlinear effect that needs to be captured in aeroelastic analyses to better understand the behaviors of these types of aircraft structures. A frequency analysis of a rotating blade structure is performed to demonstrate the analytical method. A flutter analysis of a truss-braced wing aircraft is performed to analyze the effect of geometric nonlinear effect of tension stiffening on the flutter speed. The results show that the geometric nonlinear tension stiffening effect can have a significant impact on the flutter speed prediction. In general, increased wing loading results in an increase in the flutter speed. The study illustrates the importance of accounting for the geometric nonlinear tension stiffening effect in analyzing the truss-braced wing aircraft.

Aeroelasticity↗

Multiscale Mesh Adaptation for Transonic Aeroelastic Flutter Problems

This work applies multiscale mesh adaptation with refine to reduce spatial discretization error of aeroelastic computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Benchmark flutter models, such as the pitch and plunge NACA64A-010 airfoil and the benchmark supercritical wing, are studied with both a linearized frequency-domain solver and time-marching CFD coupled to a modal structural solver in FUN3D. The undeformed NASA Common Research Model (CRM), an aeroelastic jig shape variant of the CRM, is also studied with the linearized frequency-domain approach. For these cases, the adaptation process converges to comparable flutter predictions to hand-generated meshes but with smaller node counts. However the additional disciplines of the linearized frequency-domain analysis, the mesh deformation, and the unsteady finite-volume solver create robustness challenges that need to be addressed before it can be applied as a fully automated process for complex transonic aeroelastic problems. In particular, negative volumes are observed to be an issue for FUN3D’s linear elasticity mesh deformation solver when moving the adapted meshes.

Aeroelasticity↗

Dynamic Aeroelastic Flight Dynamic Modeling of Mach 0.745 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing

This paper presents a modeling approach for dynamic aeroelastic flight dynamic analysis of the Mach0.745 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing. The modeling approach is based on a transonic correction method to correct the Theodorsen’s theory for transonic flow. CFD unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS) simulations are conducted using FUN3D solver for a series of wing sections from the Mach 0.745Transonic Truss-Braced Wing in pitch and plunge oscillations. Unsteady lift and pitching moment coefficients are obtained and used to develop the correction terms in the Theodorsen’s theory to account for transonic aerodynamics. The unsteady lift and pitching moment derivatives with respect to the unsteady angle of attack are obtained as functions of the reduced frequency. These derivatives are used to compute the unsteady lift and pitching moment contributions by the angle of attack, pitch rate, and roll rate. They are then approximated using a frequency-domain regression to obtain the dynamic stability derivatives for the Mach 0.745 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing. The structural dynamic mode shapes of the Mach 0.745 TTBW are extracted from a NAS-TRAN finite-element model. These mode shapes are used to compute the generalized unsteady aerodynamic forces. The aerodynamic mass, damping, and stiffness and the aerodynamic lag states are constructed to couple the dynamic aeroelastic contribution to the flight dynamic model of the Mach 0.745 Transonic Truss-Braced Wing. The coupled dynamic aeroelastic flight dynamic equations of motion are formulated. The eigenvalues of the coupled system are computed. All the flight dynamic modes and structural dynamic modes are stable at Match 0.745. The effect of transonic aerodynamics generally causes all the dynamic modes to have lower damping values

Flight Dynamics↗

Aeroelastic Analysis of an Urban Air Mobility Rotor in Forward Edgewise Flight

Urban Air Mobility vehicle concepts represent a new type of vertical lift machine. From the use of multirotor configurations to the use of variable RPM for thrust control of rigid, propeller-style rotors, many of the UAM concepts observed in industry have departed significantly from traditional VTOL designs. While such novel vehicle types may provide beneficial mission capability and efficiency, they have not been as thoroughly studied as more traditional configurations, and new aeromechanics analysis must be conducted. Operating states such as low-tip-speed rotors in edgewise flight may prove to yield unusual aeroelastic behavior and must be investigated. In the present work, a rotorcraft comprehensive analysis is used to analyze the aeroelastic characteristics of a fixed-pitch, variable RPM rotor in edgewise flight. The rotor model, a three-bladed, fixed pitch propeller, was developed in a previous work. Floquet theory analysis is used to capture the periodic nature of the dynamics. Parameters such as rotor rotational speed, forward flight speed, and blade torsion stiffness are varied and their impact on performance and stability are assessed. A value of torsion stiffness is identified to yield stable flight from 0-100 kts with a wide range of RPM values. The results may be used to provide insight into the aeroelastic characteristics of certain UAM-type rotors.

Aeroelastic Analysis↗

Comprehensive Analysis Aeroelastic Stability Predictions for the Mars Sample Recovery Helicopters and Ingenuity

A rotorcraft comprehensive analysis was used to generate aeroelastic stability predictions for both Ingenuity and the Mars Sample Recovery Helicopters. The analysis was performed multiple times for each rotor system with sequential increases to the level of modeling complexity. Initial cases used an independent blade analysis, trim inflow distribution, no airframe degrees of freedom, and a hover condition (a time-invariant problem). The final model used all blades, dynamic inflow, airframe degrees of freedom, and a Floquet theory approach to the flutter analysis. The approach of sequentially increasing modeling complexity was employed to ensure the causes of any observed instabilities could be identified. For each case, stability results were determined across a range of air densities, tip Mach numbers, and rotor collective pitch settings. For the Sample Recovery Helicopter, a forward flight condition analysis with the highest level of modeling complexity was also performed. The aeroelastic stability predictions showed both the Ingenuity and Sample Recovery Helicopter rotor systems to be stable for all analyzed conditions. Parameter excursions of structural properties were performed to explore conditions resulting in aeroelastic instabilities.

Aeroelastic↗

Investigations of an Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Problem with MPhys and FUN3D

High-fidelity aeroelastic optimization capabilities are becoming more common in recent years. In this field, researchers typically present results on the design problems of greatest interest to them. The lack of consistency with respect to baseline configurations, design variables, objectives and constraints, etc., makes it difficult to compare approaches and creates an obstacle for the community to work together to advance the state of the art. The High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Working Group has been established to create and study a series of benchmark aeroelastic optimization problems that the community can utilize to compare methods on the same optimization problem. This paper presents optimization results from NASA Langley Research Center for the first benchmark case of this series with analysis based on MPhys, a multiphysics library for OpenMDAO, and FUN3D, an unstructured computational fluid dynamics suite of tools. For the optimization case presented, it is demonstrated that a progression of increasing aerodynamic model fidelity reduces the wall time required to complete the optimization.

Aeroelasticity↗

Investigations of an Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Problem with MPhys and FUN3D

High-fidelity aeroelastic optimization capabilities are becoming more common in recent years. In this field, researchers typically present results on the design problems of greatest interest to them. The lack of consistency with respect to baseline configurations, design variables, objectives and constraints, etc., makes it difficult to compare approaches and creates an obstacle for the community to work together to advance the state of the art. The High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Optimization Benchmark Working Group has been established to create and study a series of benchmark aeroelastic optimization problems that the community can utilize to compare methods on the same optimization problem. This paper presents optimization results from NASA Langley Research Center for the first benchmark case of this series with analysis based on MPhys, a multiphysics library for OpenMDAO, and FUN3D, an unstructured computational fluid dynamics suite of tools. For the optimization case presented, it is demonstrated that a progression of increasing aerodynamic model fidelity reduces the wall time required to complete the optimization.

CFD↗

Space transportation system technology symposium. Volume 2 - Dynamics and aeroelasticity

The Space Shuttle, being an hybrid – an airplane and a launch vehicle – represents the greatest challenge that the dynamicist and the aeroelastician have faced. Some specific problem areas related to the Space Shuttle are listed on figure 1. Dynamics and aeroelasticity envelop many disciplines, including aerodynamics, vibration, random processes, structures, fluid flow, mechanics, etc., but, of more importance, they involve the interaction and coupling of many of these various disciplines. Fundamentally, we are concerned with structural integrity and safe flight, i.e., trying to ensure that the vehicle will remain structurally intact as well as function properly in the presence of the many faceted dynamic environment. A new area which may have an impact on our task is the effect of the high temperature environment. In the past, we have been able to successfully decouple the temperature effects from our problem formulation. For the Space Shuttle, this problem must be closely reexamined. As has been pointed out in the opening remarks of the Conference, the Dynamics and Aeroelasticity Technology Group comprises one of several technology groups which are attempting to provide the necessary research to support a successful and safe vehicle. The group has members from most of the NASA Centers as well as from the Air Force groups. We meet periodically to review ongoing work, search for new problem areas; and we are constantly updating and revising our program. The group is organized into three panels as shown on figure 2: a panel on Dynamic Loads and Response, one on Aeroelasticity, and one on Flight Dynamics and Environment. The Conference papers accordingly have been grouped in these same three areas, with each Panel Chairman acting as moderator for his particular session.

Source record↗

Influence of static aeroelasticity on oblique winged aircraft

Interest has recently been expressed about the impact of static aeroelasticity on the lateral control of oblique winged aircraft. An attempt is made to illustrate, by use of a simple example, together with results from published literature, an aeroelastic phenomenon which is believed to be unique to oblique winged aircraft. This phenomenon is the aeroelastic roll moment and occurs because upward bending deflection of the sweptforward wing generates additional lift while the converse is true of sweptback wings.

Weisshaar, T. A.↗

Comparison of flight measurements with predictions from aeroelastic models in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel

The NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel, which has a variable density, Freon-12 (or air) test medium, was designed to study the dynamics and aeroelastic problems of aerospace vehicles. During the operation of this facility there have been various opportunities to compare wind tunnel and flight test results. Some of these opportunities arise from routine flight checks of the prototype, others from carefully designed comparative wind tunnel and flight experiments. A collection of data obtained from various published and unpublished sources is presented. The topics covered are: gust and buffet response, control surface effectiveness, flutter, and active control of aeroelastic effects. Some benefits and shortcomings of Freon-12 as a test medium are also discussed. Although areas of uncertainty are evident and there is a continuing need for improvements in model simulation and testing techniques, the results presented herein indicate that predictions from aeroelastic model tests are, in general, substantiated by full-scale flight tests.

Reed, W. H., III↗

Comparisons of flight measurements with predictions from aeroelastic models in the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel

The NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel, which has a variable density Freon-12 (or air) test medium, was designed for the study of dynamics and aeroelastic problems of aerospace vehicles. During the 15 years of operation of this facility there have been various opportunities to compare wind tunnel and flight test results. Some of these opportunities arise from routine flight checks of the prototype, others from carefully designed comparative wind tunnel and flight experiments. Data obtained from various sources is presented. The topics covered are: gust and buffet response, control surface effectiveness, flutter, and active control of aeroelastic effects. Some benefits and shortcomings of Freon-12 as a test medium are also discussed. Although areas of uncertainly are evident and there is a continuing need for improvements in model simulation and testing techniques, the results indicate that predictions from aeroelastic model tests are, in general, substantiated by full scale flight tests.

Reed, W. H., III↗

Unsteady aerodynamic flow field analysis of the space shuttle configuration. Part 2: Launch vehicle aeroelastic analysis

An exploratory analysis has been made of the aeroelastic stability of the Space Shuttle Launch Configuration, with the objective of defining critical flow phenomena with adverse aeroelastic effects and developing simple analytic means of describing the time-dependent flow-interference effects so that they can be incorporated into a computer program to predict the aeroelastic stability of all free-free modes of the shuttle launch configuration. Three critical flow phenomana have been identified: (1) discontinuous jump of orbiter wing shock, (2) inlet flow between orbiter and booster, and (3) H.O. tank base flow. All involve highly nonlinear and often discontinuous aerodynamics which cause limit cycle oscillations of certain critical modes. Given the appropriate static data, the dynamic effects of the wing shock jump and the HO tank bulbous base effect can be analyzed using the developed quasi-steady techniques. However, further analytic and experimental efforts are required before the dynamic effects of the inlet flow phenomenon can be predicted for the shuttle launch configuration.

Reding, J. P.↗