A combination numerical-analytical approach to ascent trajectory optimization.
Combination numerical-analytical approach to ascent trajectory optimization
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Combination numerical-analytical approach to ascent trajectory optimization
A Mars Sample Return mission is the highest priority science mission for the next decade recommended by the recent Decadal Survey of Planetary Science, the key community input process that guides NASAs science missions. A feasibility study was conducted of a potentially simple and low cost approach to Mars Sample Return mission enabled by the use of developing commercial capabilities. Previous studies of MSR have shown that landing an all up sample return mission with a high mass capacity lander is a cost effective approach. The approach proposed is the use of an emerging commercially available capsule to land the launch vehicle system that would return samples to Earth. This paper describes the mission and technology requirements impact on the launch vehicle system design, referred to as the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV).
A Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) systems engineering study is underway to define the driving requirements, system architecture, major risks, and required technology developments to support the launch of a rock core sample to a specified delivery orbit for later retrieval and return to Earth. The proposed MAV would essentially be a small-scale launch vehicle, the first of its kind to be launched autonomously from another planet. The MAV would be a flight element of the proposed Mars Sample Return (MSR) campaign architecture, which currently assumes a 2018 launch of the sample caching mission and a 2024 (Earth) launch date of the MAV and lander, with arrival on Mars in 2025. After 9 months on the surface the MAV would be erected and launched to a specified delivery orbit. In the delivery orbit it would release its payload, a 5 kg sphere containing the rock core sample. An orbiter would rendezvous and capture the payload, returning it to Earth a year later.
The in-situ production of propellants for Mars missions will utilize carbon dioxide (CO2) in the Mars atmosphere to produce oxygen. The oxygen then needs to be cooled, liquefied, and stored to be available for Mars ascent propulsion, which could be up to 2 years after liquefaction starts. Recent investigations have demonstrated the feasibility of both achieving zero boiloff and controlling the pressure of oxygen within a tank using high-efficiency reverse turbo-Brayton-cycle cryocoolers. A tube-on-tank configuration is being studied in this work. The cooling fluid circulating in the cryocooler system is routed through a network of cooling tubes on the oxygen tank. The oxygen gas produced from the in-situ production process is introduced into the chilled tank. A series of analysis of this configuration has been performed to investigate the liquefaction rate inside the tank, the thermal gradient near the top of the tank where the oxygen gas feeding tubing is located. The analyses include 2D axisymmetric CFD analysis using ANSYS Fluent, 1D thermal analysis using Matlab, and 3D thermal analysis using MSC Patran/pthermal. These three models correlate and validate each other.
In many human Mars exploration architectures, a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) is used at the end of a surface stay to transport crew from the Martian surface to a waiting in-space transportation vehicle. It is possible for this transportation vehicle to be placed in any of several different Mars orbits, the selection of which drives the flight duration of the MAV from launch to docking and the amount of propellant required on the transportation vehicle to reach the same orbit. This paper identifies existing NASA standards and supplies habitability subject matter expert recommendations for the human habitation capabilities of the MAV as a function of flight duration. Living and working functions that may potentially be carried aboard a MAV are assessed. Flight durations considered include up to 8 hours, 8-24 hours, 1-2 days, 2-3 days, 3-4 days, and 4-7 days, which book end flight durations necessary to reach the transportation vehicle at different possible Mars orbits. This analysis will determine if there are key durations that serve as significant break points in required MAV capability.
The primary mission of the NASA Mars Sample Return (MSR) Campaign is to return samples of the Martian surface to Earth for scientific study. As part of this campaign, NASA is developing a Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV). This vehicle must survive an approximate two year journey to the Martian surface as a payload aboard a separate lander spacecraft. After residing on the surface for another year, the MAV will carry a payload of samples into orbit. From there, following ejection from the MAV, the samples will rendezvous with an Earth return spacecraft for capture, and ultimately, return to Earth.The design of the MAV represents a number of unique challenges, as no launch vehicle has ever left the surface of a planet other than Earth. Although conceptual designs for a MAV have been in various levels of development since the 1970s, none have achieved the level of fidelity and support that exists in the current MSR-MAV design. Early MSR-MAV concept studies examined multiple methods of propulsion, ultimately deciding that a Two Stage to Orbit (TSTO) solid propulsion vehicle would provide the most capable performance in a Martian environment. Following this key architecture decision, the vehicle design was further matured to a Solid-Solid Guided-Guided (SSGG) architecture for NASA Key Decision Point A (KDP-A). Although the SSGG design was able to meet all mission constraints, concerns were raised regarding limited mass margin on other elements of the MSR campaign at such an early phase. A design challenge was issued to reduce MAV total mass by as much as possible. It was ultimately determined that by moving a number of components of the vehicle second stage to the first stage, the overall vehicle mass could be reduced significantly. The new design featured a much smaller and completely unguided second stage. This paper describes the resultant Solid-Solid Guided-Unguided (SSGU) MAV design concept developed as part of the Systems Requirement Cycle (SRC). This design was developed primarily by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC), in association with NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The TSTO vehicle includes one solid rocket motor per stage. As the vehicle second stage is unguided, it features spin-stabilization to maintain vehicle stability during flight. An electromechanically actuated Thrust Vector Control (TVC) and a monopropellant Reaction Control System (RCS) is employed for active guidance on the first stage. The vehicle is designed to deliver up to 0.47kg of Martian samples to a Mars circular orbit of 380km at 27° inclination. Due to the extremely unique design constraints of this mission, and a recent transition to a Risk Class A posture, the MAV team was compelled to devise unconventional solutions to the vehicle design. The detailed design and analysis of these subsystems and the vehicle as a whole are discussed in this paper relative to all of the engineering disciplines involved.
Human and robotic Mars missions often include plans for landing large payloads on the planet’s surface. Thus far, landing of payload of up to approximately 1 metric ton (MT) have been successful. Future human missions have suggested large 5 to 25 MT surface payloads may be needed. Therefore, large landing vehicles with an initial mass of up to 100 MT may be required. In this chapter, the future human payload missions are assessed, investigating the mission velocity changes (delta-V) values for deorbit, deceleration, landing and ascent. The initial masses of single and multi-stage Mars landing vehicles are computed. Issues related to vehicle mass factors and delivering the needed delta-V are discussed.
NASA’s Artemis program has brought significant change to the agency’s human exploration strategy over the last several years. To better align with these policy changes, updates to several key ground rules and assumptions have been made to better support Strategic Analysis Cycle 2021 (SAC21). Of the changes, two in particular have had significant impact on the design of the Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV): the desire for minimal surface infrastructure and reduced technology investments in support of initial human missions to Mars. As a result, recent designs for the MAV are based on a nitrogen tetroxide (NTO) and mono-methyl hydrazine (MMH) two stage propulsion system. The vehicle supports two crew members from the surface up to 84 hours nominally. This paper presents further details of the current MAV reference design used in NASA’s SAC21, including descriptions of the operations, configuration, subsystem design, and vehicle mass summary. Additional detail is also provided on rational that drove specific design changes since the last MAV concept, published in 2019.
SF-25-116 Bridge for accessing Ascent extracts in a Trame application to create intuitive computational steering interfaces for HPC simulations.
Variational calculus and computer logic for optimization of ascent trajectories and propellant loadings of multistage space vehicles
Propulsion problems for lunar landing and ascent
Ascent from lunar surface problem with solution by variational calculus
Ascent and descent abort flight corridors for orbital transport vehicles - two dimensional equations of motion for point mass vehicle derived in circular earth coordinate system
Data showing effect of executing dogleg maneuver on Surveyor direct-ascent launch window lengths and instantaneous impact point earth traces
Simulator study of pilot control over lunar module during ascent from lunar surface
Ascent existence and uniqueness proof for linear ordinary differential equations
Segmented weighting scheme for steepest ascent optimization applied to extremum values of scalar performance indexes
Ascent rate of jimsphere balloons indicating vertical air currents